The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unhappily Ever After. Any appropriate content can be merged at editor discretion into the target article. EdJohnston (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Malloy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:FICT. No refs. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 21:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect back to Unhappily Ever After or keep. While there are no citations, that's only because nobody's put them there yet. These articles were just created this week. Its reasonable to assume that many reviews have been written about the show, and at least some of them include sketches of the main characters. Redirect will allow regular editors of the main page to find sources for what's in the revision history and build up the main article first, then break out articles about the characters. Squidfryerchef (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.