The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. 4 unanimous keep !votes, blatantly meets WP:N, (non-admin closure) — neuro^(talk) 21:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Hamsa Ultralights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Search generated no material references in bona fide third party sources. Reference in directories of aviation companies is not significant coverage. Bongomatic 09:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This ultralight aircraft manufacturer is of international stature in its field and there should be an article on it. I think at this point it just needs some better references added. I will try to find some and add them. - Ahunt (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - One of India's leading small aircraft manufacturers? Are you kidding? And a listing in Janes All the World’s Aircraft isn't good enough for you? C'mon. I'm all for deleting non-notable companies, but this goes a bit far. AKRadecki^Speaketh 16:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Raj Hamsa appears to be a major player in Microlight/ultrlight aircraft - [1] refers to completion of its 1000th aircraft (and production of that number of aircraft does seem to imply some sort of notability. This webpage from the FIA refers to it being India's only microlight manufacturer in 2000. [2], [3] and [4] give details of there aircraft., while the X'Air has an entry in Brassey's World Aircraft & Systems Directory 1999/2000 edition (p.550) giving specifications. [5] is another article on the X'Air, while [6] is from Flight International.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As per other comments and refs have now been added by other users that show notability. MilborneOne (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Using the links that Nigel Ish provided, a quick Google search and a run though my own library turned up many useful references that show that this company is notable by the Wiki definition. I have added some of these to the article, along with a bit of text. I hope this will show that the article does not need deleting, but just a bit of improving. - Ahunt (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.