The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rachnadevi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources at all, nor could I find any. This is also unfortunately the case on the corresponding article from hiwiki. Silikonz💬 14:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Silikonz💬 14:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment: The article itself has been changed to say that There is no references to Rachnadevi but she is the wife of Shrigupta. Silikonz💬 14:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, and Royalty and nobility. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can confirm, there are no sources found in Gbooks, Gscholar or Jstor. Oaktree b (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article should have never been published without sources. --Excutient^Talk 15:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this and Devamala (Shunga dynasty), also by the same creator, are, at best, unverifiable and, at worst, hoaxes. Nothing coming up in searches. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not encyclopaedic, zero sources. WP:NOTESSAY, WP:OR, and WP:NOTMIRROR all seem relevant. CT55555(talk) 00:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I just removed three blank references. I am almost certain this is a hoax trying to appear credible by faking references. In the hopes of SNOW, Delete. HouseBlaster^talk 04:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:V - yet another NN fictional or legendary character, not found in any historical or religious text. Bearian (talk) 04:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. Not even close. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above: no notability. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.