- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 16:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Plushgun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article on band with only one, so-far-unreleased, album. No real sources attesting to notability. CalendarWatcher (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete As per one unreleased album. If I'm being misled by nominator they should be severely punished!ChildofMidnight (talk) 10:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Record deal with Tommyboy? Hmmm. I'm bowing out. ChildofMidnight (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete. They are one of the biggest Tommy Boy artists (they have been the featured band on the Tommy Boy Website since summer). They recently performed live on WGN in Chicago and were in an episode of Gossip Girl. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.159.192.10 (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. How Plushgun gained popularity is notable. It's unique how the band was spotted by a notable independent label, Tommy Boy Records at South by Southwest music festival because of Plushgun's initial expose through We Need Girlfriends and the website Ourstage. Is there any other band that signed a major record deal because of a youtube video? Plushgun was also featured in an National Public Radio article here: [1] Noneforall (talk) 01:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Very limited third party coverage as in Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 03:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Noneforall. - Mgm|(talk) 09:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An interesting story about the band's signing, which could show notability, if it were covered in reliable sources. However, the ref in the article is a press release, and I didn't see any third party coverage. gnfnrf (talk) 15:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Third party source explaining relevance of Tommy Boy signing band through Ourtstage: http://media.www.uwmleader.com/media/storage/paper980/news/2008/11/13/Music/Your-Stage.Is.Ourstage-3540004-page2.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.159.64.10 (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment With this new source, Plushgun has been the subject of two nontrivial publications (the other being from Spinner.com, here: [2])about Plushgun's relationship to Ourstage and Tommy Boy Records. Another article from NPR talked about the band [3], but not about how Plushgun was signed by Tommy Boy Records. Noneforall (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:MUSIC, articles in college papers are "generally.. considered trivial". The new source is the UWM Leader. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 21:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:MUSIC criterion #1. In addition to the Spinner and NPR stories, I found a review in the Orlando Sentinel by Jim Abbott: "Plushgun", 2008-08-22, p. 32. Also found a mention about Plushgun's Tommy Boy deal in The Christian Science Monitor, "OurStage hosts online talent show" by Matthew Shaer, 2008-08-22, p. 25. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.