The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pau Grande (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:ONEOTHER. Onlk (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Onlk (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I couldn't find any other entries. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nominators reason. Unneccessary disambiguation. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 12:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete: I see no encyclopedic relevance suggest deletion. BeenDominic (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC) — BeenDominic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's a WP:DICDEF masquerading as a Dab page. There's no specific rule against this, but let's use common sense. Bearian (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.