The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Mullee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Wikipedia:Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event. That doesn't appear to be the case here. Uhooep (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Ecuador, and Uruguay. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only routine coverage, nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Some coverage: [1], [2]. These could be used if a list of ambassadors is created. Lamona (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Neither articles are not indepth coverage of Patrick Mullee. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.