The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 17:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Brooklyn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep on the grounds this passed AFD with a KEEP DECISION only a month ago with most if not all of the original nominator's concerns addressed. Articles must not be renominated in such a short period of time in order to get a desired result. 23skidoo (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I was not involved with the prior AfD, but I am not persuaded by any of the arguments for keep in the prior one. An IMDb entry does not confer notability in itself, and I don't see any other notable sources or participants. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Article has not deteriorated since the last AFD, nor are there any new compelling reasons to delete this. Stifle (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.