The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. StarM 04:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Momentem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Referenced, but the product has only just launched - and the reference for that only says "reportedly". I don't want to assume a conflict of interest, but surely an article can wait a few months. — FIRE!^{in a crowded theatre...} 22:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep notability demonstrated the usual way. I see no reason to deviate from the standard practice here. WilyD 12:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the nominator is stating that the article is referenced, so I am unclear on the rationale for deletion. A conflict of interest is an issue for cleanup through editting and not deletion -- Whpq (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.