The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G7) by Elonka. Non-admin closure. Now let's all have a beer (or soda)! MuZemike (talk) 04:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moises Lino e Silva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is about a PhD student who received two scholarships and has written some articles. The article is an autobiography. (The reason that you don't see notability, COI, and reference tags are not visible is that the chief editor of this article has removed them five times consecutively.) Bongomatic 01:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Bongomatic has been persecuting my articles. Bongomatic obviously doesn't know enough of the academic work to understand that for Gareth Doherty to have an article published by MIT is in itself something worth of notability. Not to mention that Bongomatic clearly doesn't understand the worth of the award given by Harvard to some teachers. 340 teachers received the prize out of how many teachers in the whole university?

Scholarships are something of notability by default as they always involve strong competition.

To get published is something of notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.242.178 (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the article was written by Linoesilva (talk,contributions), whose username coincides with the name of the subject of the article, does not mean anything has been biased.

Please, stop persecution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.242.178 (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This comment seems to be about Gareth Doherty, while the nomination is for the pate Moises Lino e Silva. Note that the article in question doesn't claim publication in any MIT-related journal, but in "Kerb Australia". Bongomatic 02:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bongomatic has been persecuting all my created wiki articles and I am defending all the articles from the persecutor. To get published by "Kerb Australia" is obviously also something of notability since it is very hard to be selected to publications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.242.178 (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to state that Bongomatic has been persecuting you. You have made a number of edits that are not appropriate, and appear not to be willing to learn enough about Wikipedia to stop erring. You are FAR beyond the 3 revert rule, you are edit warring with multiple editors who are attempting to point you in the direction of help and information. You have removed warnings and useful comments from your talk page. You do not respond usefully to concerns about your edits. Also, please sign your posts. Letting Sinebot do it for you wastes resources and is hard to read.

On the subject at hand, this is article appears to be an excellent candidate for speedy deletion, and both your IP and ID seem good candidates for temporary blocking so you can study the Wikipedia guidelines to be sure you want to "live" here. sinneed (talk) 03:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not want to live here. Thanks very much. Persecution of the type Sinneed is helping Bongomatic to make does not interest me at all. By the way, why do you want to live here yourself Sinneed? You should be constructive, not destructive, this should be the wikipedia ethos. Please, editors, delete both articles: "Moises Lino e Silva" and "Gareth Doherty". It is your loss and a real shame that people like Sinneed and Bongomatic are making wikipedia an environment of terror. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linoesilva (talk • contribs) 03:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- Perhaps speedy, as suggested by sinneed. Lacks sufficient notability, plus an obvious case of WP:COI. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 03:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, speedy! Please!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linoesilva (talk • contribs) 03:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note — User:Linoesilva has been indef blocked for harassment. MuZemike (talk) 04:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--but this probably comes as mustard after the meal, as the Dutch say. Thanks, MuzeMike, for the block. Drmies (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't thank me, thank Tanthalas39; he did the block. (I have no power to block anyone, unfortunately as I don't have nor really want the necessary "power tools.") I'm just doing a courtesy note to the closing admin, whomever that may be, for this AFD. MuZemike (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note — 138.251.242.178 has also been blocked for the same reasons as above. MuZemike (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.