The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Head (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability J2m5 (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Little impact of citations yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Not even on the average level of non-notable academic, but far below. Could have been a speedy delete. Jeppiz (talk) 10:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a notable academic, as a perennial failed candidate he isn't notable either. --Mvqr (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails both WP:PROF and WP:NPOL as failed candidate. LibStar (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not appear to have received any coverage outside of websites operated by the Socialist Equality Party, of which he is a member and frequent candidate. Fails WP:GNG, and as he has stood in multiple elections there is no redirect target. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No real WP:SIGCOV, so the the natural conclusion is that WP:GNG isn’t satisfied. I could see this being a worthwhile article if the subject was notable. Shawn Teller (talk) 04:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.