The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Absent a verbatim argument that has been posted to multiple AfDs and whose veracity has been questioned, consensus is this is not notable. StarM 04:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matoran Universe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is simply an in-universe repetition of the plot section of other Bionicle articles. As such, it is simply repetition, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:V as an article consisting entirely of plot summary with no references whatsoever and no assertion of notability. I also note what looks like some original research near the end ("It is thought that..."). --IllaZilla (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as article asserts notability through reliable sources should not be deleted. It has to stay per WP:FICT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.1.1 (talk) 18:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excuse me? There is not a single source presented in the article. Your claim is entirely false, and the article completely fails WP:FICT. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Same exact comment posted for the AFD of Toa_(Bionicle) by the same user. Perhaps this is just a mistake, and tagged on the wrong article. Fraud ^{talk to me} 03:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (including plot summaries). Fraud ^{talk to me} 03:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.