The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kensington & Chelsea Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

As per WP:CRIC, this is a non-notable local cricket team. The article has been recovered following prod deletion, since the club vice president sees it as an extension of their club website. bigissue (talk) 12:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The article was restored since this is the standard procedure for contested prods. In its present form, I support deletion of the article. --Tone 12:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable cricket club. Johnlp (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, possibly speedy A7. I don't even see an assertion of notability for the club. gnfnrf (talk) 04:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No notability claimed or offered. Nuttah (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.