The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Git (software).  Sandstein  23:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Junio Hamano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Originally, I marked the page for speedy deletion due to an apparent lack of claim of notability; the notice was removed by the creator. Subsequently, it was proposed for deletion with the following reason: "Non-notable living person, possible merge to Git (software) as this individual has nothing noteworthy about them besides being the developer of Git, an open-source software application. May not be worth even merging though, as this article has very minimal content." Since the deletion was already contested by the author (and since there's a proposal to merge the page), I'd say that a full debate won't do any harm. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Can someone translate this and say whether the subject is treated in a non-trivial fashion? This book is also a possible source. Even though I'm bringing up these sources, it seems to me that this is a case where notability is not inherited. Jeremiah (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. The German source Jeremiah mentioned above just says he manages the Git software nothing else. Since he only seems to be known for working on this software, I think a redirect is a good solution. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, merge, or delete I more-recently PROD'd the page, since the original author had removed the earlier PROD. I just don't feel the individual is notable - if we had a stub page for every open source software developer, things would get out of hand very quickly. It could be that a redirect or a merge (if any content is worth merging?) is a worthwhile move, as well. Whatever the concensus is, is probably going to be for the best. 71.61.220.126 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.