The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Whitmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NPOL as she hasn't held state-wide public office, at the very least. Bedivere (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, notable state party chair, meets WP:GNG Andre🚐 22:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This person, notable primarily as the chair of a state-level political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the article isn't referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG. This is not what it takes to make a political operative notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Bedivere (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  She has GNG and WP:SIGCOV. There are several references in the article and more coverage than simply that this person is a party chair. Andre🚐 22:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Nevada. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep given press in last 2 days adding to WP:GNG case. [1] [2] [3] LizardJr8 (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Clearly passes WP:GNG based on coverage surrounding her election as chair. Curbon7 (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Week Keep or merge to Nevada Democratic Party. There is certainly a lot of coverage, thats not in dispute. The only question I really have is whether Whitmer really need to be a stand-alone page or can it be sufficiently covered at Nevada Democratic Party? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.