- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jane Kleeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:NPOL as she hasn't held state-wide public office, at the very least. Bedivere (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, notable state party chair, meets WP:GNG Andre🚐 22:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This person, notable primarily as the chair of a state-level political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the article isn't referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG. This is not what it takes to make a political operative notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Bedivere (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This person has at least 3 well-referenced sections about different things. Not just 1. Andre🚐 22:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This person, notable primarily as the chair of a state-level political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the article isn't referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG. This is not what it takes to make a political operative notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Bedivere (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Nebraska. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly meets WP:GNG due to coverage in media. Did you do any searching WP:BEFORE nominating? – Muboshgu (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did not. I assessed the article just by reading it. I have come to the conclusion that the person is notable, after making some web search. Therefore, this nomination is withdrawn. Bedivere (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.