The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3, as vandalism, I checked textbooks, IUPAC and Pubmed and none of them heard of the term, so it's not a viable redirect either. Mgm|^(talk) 22:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hydroponicide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This appears to be an elaborate hoax. The term literally translates to 'killing water work'. The external links do not support the text. For those with a knowledge of chemistry, the equations make no sense. Richard Cavell (talk) 20:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. Page is essentially a copy and paste of hydrolysis with search & replace changes. As the c&p separates it from contributor history it is a copyvio. JulesH (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • What do you mean by the second sentence? The wikipedia hydrolysis article is not copyrighted. - Richard Cavell (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• G3 Cut & paste vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.