The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Heckler & Koch HK21. Unsourced (and very badly written) content should not be merged, although this can be done from the history with the respective improvements.  Sandstein  20:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HK GR9C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Um...Unremarkable Gun? No references, "the weapon doesn't have a name" and uses of "unlikely" and generally the writer isn't even sure what the gun is. Dengero (talk) 01:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even in the best case scenario, this is unsourced and unverifiable. The text is hopelessly poor writing. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. If sources can be found then I would support a merge to Heckler & Koch HK21. hbent (talk) 03:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Heckler & Koch HK21, where HK GR9 already redirects and where the GR9 is mentioned in the last sentence of the "Variants" section. If anyone is interested in this thing, it's probably worthwhile to keep the GR9C entry in List of Heckler & Koch products a blue link. Deor (talk) 03:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Heckler & Koch HK21 - the C is a camouflaged variant of the GR9. It's not an ideal solution to have the HK21 and HK23 and all variants in the one article, but this is the best practical solution. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.