The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I do wonder if there's perhaps potential for a merger into an article about relationships between Japan and the Caribbean countries, but a collection of unconnected bits of information isn't allowed per NOTINDISCRIMINATE, and as such I find the unstated "keep" somewhat weak. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grenada–Japan relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The relations between these countries are quite minor and fails WP:GNG. 1 minor agreement, 2 Japanese people living in Grenada (!) and no embassies don't make for notable relations. LibStar (talk) 04:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Grenada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. There is quite a bit more information available on the Japanese Wikipedia page, and there is more significance about the relationship at this Japanese embassy page and in pages online surrounding Japanese reactions to the American invasion, such as this page on questions raised in the Japanese House of Representatives. From the Grenada side there is some significant coverage on the first few pages at NOW Grenada. Based on the coverage there I don't think the idea of only 1 minor agreement is quite right; apparently JICA spends 500 million yen a year in Grenada as well (partly related to fisheries), but it seems that Japan often treats the CARICOM member countries as a group, and there haven't been many editors actively working on this article. My impression is that this could be saved with the incorporation of GNG-satisfying media coverage in Grenada and/or Japan. Dekimasuよ! 06:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the Japanese wikipedia page doesn't actually cover much- what diplomatic delegations in other countries would be responsible for issues if they arose mostly. But one thing they do mention that seems noteworthy is that Grenada is one of 12 countries not to send anyone to the coronation of Japan's new emperor. Certainly doesn't seem like there are any bilateral relations. --(loopback) ping/whereis 10:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I am a bit confused, Why are you indicating for deletion, while also saying that the fact about Grenada being only a handful of countries not to recognize the new emperor is noteworthy? I would say that that fact merits the article be kept. Bensci54 (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That fact doesn't necessarily make the subject notable. The article has to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, Dekimasu are you arguing for Keeping this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the topic. Yilloslime (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.