The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Cody Havero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No sources; entirely in-universe. With only a couple hundred Google hits, unlikely an article conforming to policy (ie, WP:V & WP:RS) could be written on this subject. Biruitorul ^Talk 23:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge I don't see this character as significant enough for an individual entry. DGG (talk) 05:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable, and is nothing to merge. Article has no sources, so would be merging OR.Yobmod (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.