The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Divinepark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

article with unclear notability. If it is possible to establish notability, it needs to be rewritten. Beagel (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Misspelled, and you would think that something that's been around for 22 years would attract more than three google hits (once I got rid of Wikipedia and the horse). Mangoe (talk) 14:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--per nom. And per Mangoe. I get a headache just looking at this kind of writing. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. From a quick look, the article appears to be copyvio from the organization's home page. • Gene93k (talk) 09:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.