The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dilemma of determinism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two-stage model of free will, the article creator, User:Cmsreview, started a bunch of articles on the same general topic area of free will, with no real sources writing about the specific article topic, and the text based on a patchwork of sources to create a synthesis of research unsupported as a whole by reliable sources. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator ----Snowded ^TALK 04:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there is such a dilemma but this is a fork of material that should be included in either Free will or Determinism Peter Damian (talk) 07:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - just no. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the WP:GARDEN that needs to be turned over. jps (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.