The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Maxim Micic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Grammy nom, no chart, and no gold record means subject fails WP:MUSICBIO. Of the sources I could find that did not fail WP:SPS, many failed WP:RS and were not independent of the subject. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are twelve criteria in WP:MUSICBIO and a person only has to satisfy one of them to be considered notable. This musician flunks all twelve, but your nomination gives the impression that you only considered three before nominating. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Serbia. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - He has a few friendly interviews and product endorsements here and there, but otherwise I can find nothing reliable and significant from the music media, at least under the spelling of his name given here. He's been around for a while but simply hasn't achieved the notice that is necessary for an article here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.