The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 22:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Calautti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any substantial coverage in WP:RS independent of the subject. She has played in at least two different football codes but I can't find anything other than passing mentions, Wikipedia mirrors or database sites, even when searching Australian sources. I have also searched under 'Danielle Calautti' and found nothing better than the non-independent sources already cited. Best sources I can find are VAFA, a trivial mention, Ozfootball, a squad list mention, and Comment News, which mentions her twice and calls her a standout player. We would need at least a couple of articles to go into significant depth about her as an individual to pass WP:SPORTBASIC. Given that this does not appear to be the case from the above, AfD seems reasonable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - found a mention in a local paper, which is part of the Sun Herald Group. However, I suggest that source fails notability, and mention is not significant. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 23:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above and WP:HOLE. NYC Guru (talk) 06:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks significant coverage. Charsaddian (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.