The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CD Freaks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable website spam with no reliable sources. Previous AfD arguments (2005) are no longer relevant as WP:WEB doesn't rely on rankings, just notability.

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 08:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The amount of traffic to this site is more than enough, as I said in the previous debate three years ago, almost all sources are not independent. The best I could find was a very brief mention here, but it was really a quote from someone related to the site about Obama. Not site related. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete'. Non-notable article with statements of biased views. Delete as per WP:V and WP:N. - DustyRain (talk) 08:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The lack of reliable sources makes the site non notable . Nuttah (talk) 10:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.