The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. as copyright violation Mgm|^(talk) 23:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ACCEPTION (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

WP:NOT a dictionary; also a possible copyvio. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per nom. Also, the definition is complete gibberish! Falls under the WP:CSD#G1 rule for speedy.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - copyright violation, so tagged. Also it's blatantly unsuitable for inclusion. (There ought to be a speedy criterion for it's-just-some-kid-mucking-around) - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.