The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Maryam Rostampour and Marziyeh Amirizadeh → Marziyeh Amirizadeh  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Maryam Rostampour → Marziyeh Amirizadeh  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

After two inconclusive AfDs (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryam Rostampour and Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryam Rostampour and Marziyeh Amirizadeh (2nd nomination)) based on a quasi-WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE situation for one of two women in the article, there was no consensus on what to do but a general sense among participants that Marziyeh Amirizadeh has a stronger claim to notability than Rostampour (who requested not deletion outright but rather not to have a bio paired with Amirizadeh), so I WP:BOLDly moved the page to Marziyeh Amirizadeh to preserve the page history. Due to the subject's request and the unusual nature of a double-named BLP, I would nominate this redirect for deletion, as well as Maryam Rostampour, for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Thank you for doing the page move, much appreciated! But there is no benefit to keeping these redirects now. – GnocchiFan (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2025–26 Lao League 1 → Lao League 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nothing at the target about the relevant season. Delete as misleading and WP:RETURNTORED. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per misleading. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:37, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also bundle 2025-26 Lao League 1. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Figel Narage → Nigel Farage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely typo / search term. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, implausible typo, possible in-joke. Carguychris (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Generative pre-trained transformer. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:21, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• GPT-5 → ChatGPT  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This SEEMS too soon at a glance, but considering the fact that reliable news sources have mentioned a GPT-5 coming out, this actually makes a surprising amount of sense.

So, then, why am I nominating this redirect? Simple. Because it's not mentioned in the article. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it should redirect to generative pre-trained transformer, which is the underlying technology, not to ClopenAI's goofy product naming gimmick. jp×g🗯️ 08:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Generative pre-trained transformer ALSO doesn't mention GPT-5 User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to generative pre-trained transformer. "Not mentioned at target" is not a WP:RDELETE criterion, and even if it was, generative pre-trained transformer mentions the GPT-n series in the lede. This is the most relevant content to the GPT-n series, including GPT-5, which is a plausible search term, aids accidental linking, and reduces risk of a duplicate article per WP:RKEEP. StainedGlassCavern (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to generative pre-trained transformer per above comment(s) ... WP:TOOSOON does not apply to redirects. —Alalch E. 22:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Xiyonji → Journey to the West  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Very novel synonym to target article. I get Xiyouji for being the pinyin pronunciation, but Xiyonji is just implausible to be a redirect for the average reader. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unlikely typo/misspelling. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:37, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep two, retarget "dying":

• Keep Stages of grief
• Keep Stages of loss
• Retarget Stages of dying to Stages of human death -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:18, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Stages of griefStages of grief → Five stages of grief  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Stages of lossStages of loss → Five stages of grief  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Stages of dyingStages of dying → Five stages of grief  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The five stages of grief are not widely accepted in all communities. Maybe retarget to Grief. Interstellarity (talk) 00:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Stages of dying to Stages of human death, where Stages of death redirects (and which people might be looking for). Dying isn't the same thing as grief, and grief can arise from many other things in addition to death. Tentative keep the other two at the current target, though—this model may not be universally accepted, but its target is the closest title match we have here (correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's the case). Regards, SONIC678 01:42, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with Sonic678. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with Sonic678 as well, except that I'd say Keep the other two, not tentatively-- while the 5 stages of grief may not be universally accepted, as stated, it is familiar to a wide range of people who may not even be aware that it might be controversial or not fully accepted; it was definitely taught to me in middle school as flat out fact, without quivocation, and I don't think I'm alone here. Besides, no other model I'm aware of uses "stages" of grief or loss, so this should still be the correct topic. Fieari (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).