The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Retargeting to wiktionary as the most apt compromise. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hippotaur → Jumart  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. The target describes a cattle/equine hybrid, while a "hippotaur" would presumably be a cattle/hippo hybrid. Common usage does not seem to usually be referring to a jumart. Rusalkii (talk) 04:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I can't find any sources to justify a mention at the target, but it's a reasonable construction. The prefix hippo- means "horse", not "hippopotamus". jlwoodwa (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I forgot about the "horse" meaning, good point. I think I still lean delete but much more weakly. Rusalkii (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete at the moment, as a bad pun as unmentioned, possibly veering into original research (original guesstimating?). little prejudice against genetically engineering hippo cows though, it'd be funny consarn _{(wouldn't it be fucked up if there was a hippotaur?)} 13:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  results gave me nothing of note, by the way. only furry ocs and ai slop consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 13:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Really, consarn? You're calling a c.ai bot "ai slop"? (Especially one that seems to have effort put in?)

  I looked up to you for a while, but I'm starting to regret that. For crying out loud, you're on Wikipedia so in the same amount of time it took you to write this comment you could've gone to the Wikipedia article for ACTUAL slop. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 13:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  nah, i mean bird app ai slop (the horror!). though i do also happen to not be the biggest c.ai fan (or hater) in existence, that's for reasons unrelated to this specific case consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 15:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or soft redirect to wikt:hippotaur. Enix150 (talk) 03:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per consarn. No incoming links, I don't see benefit in the wikt retarget. Jay 💬 13:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wiktionary or Delete - the current target seems to be unmentioned OR. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Line of Corpses → Netzarim Corridor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This phrase seems to have been used recently by a Haaretz publication to refer to the military line in Gaza, and several other outlets have picked that up. The primary long-term topic according to a quick search is the song by that name on the album Wreath of Barbs, which we mention on that article. Not sure if it is best to delete altogether or redirect to the album; normally I would consider redirecting myself but this is a controversial topic so sending to RFD for community discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you are referring to the Haaretz article "No Civilians. Everyone's a Terrorist': IDF Soldiers Expose Arbitrary Killings and Rampant Lawlessness in Gaza's Netzarim Corridor". A least in the English version, the actual phrase seems to be 'the line of dead bodies' from the following sentence.

• The forces in the field call it 'the line of dead bodies'" a commander in Division 252 tells Haaretz. "After shootings, bodies are not collected, attracting packs of dogs who come to eat them. In Gaza, people know that wherever you see these dogs, that's where you must not go.

Same in this editorial and this MSNBC report.

This phrase then seems to be transformed to 'line of corpses' in reports/posts about the Haaretz report for some reason. Either way, it doesn't seem like a very useful redirect. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the page was created by Sa1e24, a user without extendedconfirmed privileges. The page creation was therefore a WP:ARBECR violation and should probably have been speedily deleted. Sean.hoyland (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. With no opposition, "delete both for now, without prejudice" carries. asilvering (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Transsexuals → Category:Transgender people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Category:Homosexuals → Category:LGBTQ people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Despite being Transsexuals being useful, it should be moved to Category:Transsexual people instead, to avoid derogation. While for homosexuals, it's misleading, not every LGBTQ individual experiences homosexuality or identifies as homosexual. However, I wouldn't oppose a move to Category:Homosexual people. LIrala (talk) 01:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would propose Transsexuals -> Transsexual people and Homosexuals -> homosexual people. And make sure everyone in those categories identifies specifically with those terms. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 19:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• If the reason these are nominated at RfD is because the names are derogatory and the redirects should be deleted, then I have no objection. Delete and create the ones with new names. Start adding specific articles to the categories as appropriate outside of this RfD. Jay 💬 09:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Homosexuals, category redirects don't have to be true of everyone in the category. Regarding Transsexuals, this is what happens when people deliberately make things worse. We used to have Category:Transgender and transsexual people, which recognized that there are some trans people who identify as transgender, some who identify as transsexual, and some as both. Some people disliked that name, some for policy-based reasons, some for IDONTLIKEIT ones. (N.B.: transsexual, while often a politically loaded term, is a term with a distinct academic meaning, not a slur, and is treated as such by this encyclopedia.) Splitting the category based on who is transgender and who is transsexual would have been painstaking, especially because sources are not always so clear on who identifies as which, and so what did CfD choose to do? It just renamed the category. Not even to trans, the catch-all term, but to transgender—a term that admittedly covers most people in the category, but not all of them. So, sure, instead of either leaving things be or doing the hard work of untangling things, let's just deliberately introduce factual errors into dozens/hundreds(?) of articles!
  So it's CfD's mess. Or maybe it's the admin team's mess, because that CfD was plagued with battleground conduct but most admins are afraid to touch WP:GENSEX. The solution here would be for someone to just create Category:Transsexual people and start populating it. The CfD's close says not to do that without consensus at WT:LGBTQ+, but, with respect, I don't think a WikiProject can be given binding power over whether a category ought to exist. Someone should just create the category, and if someone else objects they can take it to CfD, and maybe things will go smoother this time 'round.
  If that category is created, retarget there. If not, delete both for now, without prejudice against creating as redirects there if the category is later created. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 03:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• WikiProject Women in Red/Awards/Dominican Republic → Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Awards/Dominican Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Discouraged XNR. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't deliberate - I accidentally added a redlist in the wrong place and had to move it. I don't have the rights to move a page without creating a redirect, and it didn't occur to me that I should ask someone to delete it. So go ahead and get rid of it! Thanks. DrThneed (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:XNR to non reader content. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• WikiProject Southern African Music & Sound → Wikipedia:WikiProject Southern African Music & Sound  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Discouraged XNR. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:XNR to non reader content. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - remnant of an erroneous page move which was corrected within 2 hours. Jay 💬 09:25, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Disney XD (Europe)Disney XD (Europe) → Disney XD (international)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• List of Disney XD channels in EuropeList of Disney XD channels in Europe → Disney XD (international)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Listing these two for discussion as they were/got involved with the 15+ years of creation and evolution to this current target. What do you think?Intrisit (talk) 22:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The current target lists Disney XD channels in Europe, so I don't see anything wrong with these redirects. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• F**********r → Fatherfucker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely search term. I can't see anyone typing in that many asterisks. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 20:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. An absolutely pointless redirect. JBW (talk) 20:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find only one use of this censored form, so it seems unlikely. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete absolutely implausible. If this was created recently (as opposed to back in 2007), it would prob be eligible for R3. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 23:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• delete. while censoring something so hard you can't even tell what it's supposed to be is a good strategy for age ratings, it's a terrible strategy for knowing what the thing is supposed to be consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 12:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—really?! Another absurdly implausible redirect probably created as an in-joke. Carguychris (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this seems like an odd way of censoring the term. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ambiguous or not, that's too many consecutive asterisks for it to be a likely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Two support the disambiguation page and the one keep !vote doesn't oppose it, so there's a pretty clear consensus here. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Moon and Stars → Watermelon#Varieties  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

mentioned in the target, but also... you know... it's a name not primarily associated with watermelons. to my surprise, it actually gets a lot of views, so weak retarget to crescent and star (symbol)? consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 14:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep, as the only reasonable target I can find. Crescent and star (symbol) only has one star, so this isn't a likely search term (as opposed to Moon and star, which sensibly already redirects there). I am struggling to find any other plausible targets (Maybe Astronomical object? But that's a very general term, and the Moon and stars are just two examples). If other relevant targets can be found, we can create a disambiguation page, but otherwise the watermelon variety seems like the right target to me. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Changed to disambiguate; the draft looks fine to me. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If people are using it, then we should assume that it is working. We don't have access to information about their journeys. If there are more possible targets then it should become a disambiguation page. It's probable that even if two dabs applies technically, hat notes would be over the top. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Disambiguate (drafted) for all the WP:DABMENTIONs; Zero evidence supporting that the watermelon variety is WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, and at least one weak piece of evidence against (both the incoming links are intended for a music festival in Switzerland, barely mentioned at Locarno#Image gallery). 59.149.117.119 (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Note that the option of WP:RM remains open. Jay 💬 22:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bloodhouse → Housemarque#Bloodhouse and Terramarque (1993–1994)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

It seems there has been some back and forth on this one based on the edit history of Bloodhouse and Bloodhouse (disambiguation). My instinct is to use Bloodhouse as the DAB page, but I wanted to get consensus given the history. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My consensus to redirect Bloodhouse was that Bloodhouse the game dev is definitely more notable than that of a slang word. By the way, I had redirected the pub article. MimirIsSmart (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, MimirIsSmart! Was consensus made with another editor, or are you explaining your personal decision to move the page? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The latter, so I don't object to this discussion here. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic? Notified of this discussion at the target and the disambig page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: On the first page of a Google Books search for "bloodhouse", I found multiple hits for the Australian slang topic[1][2][3] and only one for the Finnish video game company[4] (as well as some apparently unrelated hits in sci-fi and fantasy contexts[5][6][7]). On that basis, it doesn't seem like the video game company is the primary topic, so I would lean towards moving the disambiguation page to this title. By the way, Bloodhouse (rough pub) is currently a redirect to Australian pub, but maybe it should be refined to the relevant section Australian pub#Violence and crime. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or dab Note: there is no reference to the term at Australian pub, or Australian English vocabulary. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Tevildo's "delete" read as "keep" now that info has been added to the target. asilvering (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• XenopronounXenopronoun → Neopronoun#Noun-self pronouns  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

When this term is used in online MOGAI circles, it seems to refer to a kind of neopronoun that are unable to be understood by humans[8][9][10] (While I know that these sources are unreliable, there aren't really any reliable sources that discuss this topic). The current target links to "nounself pronouns", which are a different category. JJP_Master (she/they) 02:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete By their very nature, Xenopronouns aren't currently known by humans. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment many such reliable sources exist proving it is a thing. Saying things like Xenopronouns aren't currently known by humans isn't a very good argument. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 02:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: 'Xenopronouns' are briefly mentioned in the following, more reliable sources: Repertoires of Racial Resistance (book), Medicalizing Me Softly (master's thesis), and “Trans Enough” for Tumblr? (doctoral dissertation). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Significa Liberdade. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 00:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many people use this term to mean nounself pronouns or even neopronouns in general, typically because they don't know this specific definition, which is possibly a recoining or reinvention. I couldn't check what's the meaning these sources are using. It's a brief mention, only a source with a lot of microlabels and neologisms would use this meaning or know this lore. Skemous (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, without predjudice to re-creation if the appropriate information is added to the target article (or elsewhere). The current target is not what the term means, and is therefore potentially misleading (criterion 2). Tevildo (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Information has not been added to the target article (or elsewhere). Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I added mention using Significa's resources, but to the #History section, for lack of a better section. Jay 💬 11:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• South Korea women's national kho kho team → Kho Kho World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Simply listed as a participant, without any further details about the team provided. Delete to encourage article creation and because anybody searching for this title won't find the information they're looking for based on the current target. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - Dyork (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: There are a dozen more like this one. See England women's national kho kho team, for example. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also bundle South Korea national kho kho team. Jay 💬 17:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If any other redirects are to be included, they have to be properly tagged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 08:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 16:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, also bundle other such. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor _{Ping Me🔔} 06:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Is there a reason this was relisted @Patar knight? I believe this should have been closed as delete instead of giving an opportunity to add nominations on after folks have already voted. I also intended to make a batch nomination as a follow up depending on how this went. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey man im josh (talk • contribs) 15:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024-25 Romanian presidential election → 2024 Romanian presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 2024–25 Romanian presidential election → 2024 Romanian presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 2024–2025 Romanian presidential election → 2024 Romanian presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 2024-2025 Romanian presidential election → 2024 Romanian presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 2024/2025 Romanian presidential election → 2024 Romanian presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No more mainspace links connected to these redirects. Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete useless. Delete also the rest of redirects, they're of the same type [11]. Super Ψ Dro 22:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also bundle 2024–25 Romanian presidential election, which is a former title of the article. And neither comment provides a clear reason for deletion so Keep. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the original nominator to Delete this redirect, I would say that since the main voting period of the annulled presidential election was only in 2024, and thus I see no point in using article names such as 2024–25 Romanian presidential election when they led to confusion that the voting period was stretched into the new year 2025 (it was not). As there is an article 2025 Romanian presidential election for the fresh future election (which includes different presidential candidates), the obsolete redirect with no articles linked to it, should be annihilated.--Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 10:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any other redirects bundled with this one must be properly tagged with the RFD tag before they can be deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 07:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bundling up other similar redirects, notice that keeping these redirects may lead to unnecessary confusion with 2025 Romanian presidential election.--Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: there redirects were in place at a time when it was thought that the 2025 Romanian presidential election was going to be a re-run of the 2024 one (thus, part of the same process). It is now clear that these are to be treated as separate elections, so all redirects pointing to "2024/2025" (in any format) should be deleted to prevent any confusion. Impru20^talk 08:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• @Shamrockwikiedit: 2024–25 Romanian presidential election still has 3 incoming links from mainspace articles. Jay 💬 09:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for reminding, now they are all replaced, and thus there are no more mainspace articles linked to 2024–25 Romanian presidential election. Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 08:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Baku-Grozny Flight Incident: Crash in Aktau (2024) → Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This has multiple abnormal formatting issues, including at least two capitalization errors, the odd subtitle, and the use of both "incident" and "crash". Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Bizarre formatting. The abnormally high pageview is likely due to the redirect having being a duplicate article before being BLARed. The main article is much more fleshed out so I don't think there is anything in the page history worth keeping. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Not sure of action - Looking back, it seems that there were TWO articles created about the incident: first the "Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243" article on Dec 25 and then second the "Baku-Grozny Flight Incident: Crash in Aktau (2024)" article on Dec 27 . Over time, the first article was more comprehensive and so it made sense to merge the second article into the first article. After that, a redirect was set from the second page to the first page... which is the usual process I've seen. Now the question is about deleting the redirect from that second article. I guess my question is - can we tell how many external sites may link to the second article? If there are a number of sites that link to the second article, it may make sense to keep the redirect so that people reading those articles do get to the latest info on Wikipedia. If very few people linked to it, then deleting makes sense. - Dyork (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the second article was merged, the redirect from it needs to remain for attribution. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What Dyork says is that .. it made sense to merge the second article into the first..., not that there was an actual merge the BLARer Jay8g did. I don't see a merge that happened. Jay 💬 09:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no prejudice against recreation once the movie with this title is released. Cremastra (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• MemeBot → Memetics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of a "memebot" at the target article; no mention of "memebot" anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be a very obscure. This seems to be the only website that discusses the word, and I could not find any mention in literature. Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MemeBot. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor _{Ping Me🔔} 07:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merged after the AfD, and removed a month later in 2005 with comment MemeBot: removed - this Glenn Grant neologism is not accepted in memetics. Jay 💬 09:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Matthew Weldon → Ireland under-19 cricket team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of a "Matthew Weldon" at the target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete whilst he has played for Ireland U19 a few times [12], the target article does not have any mention of him. As no list article of the form List of Ireland under-19 cricketers exists, there is not a valid redirect target. He is mentioned at Munster Reds, but whenever he stops playing for them, it would not be a valid redirect there either. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 10:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Maskara → Regine Velasquez  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "maskara" at the target article. Many other mentions of "maskara" elsewhere, though. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate (drafted). The redirect is apparently referring to the theme song of Lavender Fields (TV series), but there are many other things by the same name and none look like WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Manta heavy fighter → Wing Commander: Prophecy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Neither "manta" nor "heavy" appears at the target, making this a misleading redirect that does not give information to readers about this particular search. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No need to keep the unsourced pre-redirect content - it had just the one edit in 2004 and then BLARd in 2006. Jay 💬 10:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of trademarked open-source software → Open-source software  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The word "trademark" does not appear at the article for "open-source software". No such list of "trademarked open-source software" appears at the target, therefore rendering this redirect as misleading and inappropriate at this time. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is no list. An editor wishing to add information to the target about trademarked software using the pre-redirect content, can always request for undeletion at WP:RfU. Jay 💬 10:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as no TM list exists. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cissy (Pokemon) → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Leaders  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Danny (Pokemon) → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Leaders  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Versions of pages without diacritics, containing little to no valuable history (these have always been redirects). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can't they be speedied? consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 10:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Un-bundle Danny from here and bundle with WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 10#Danny (Pokémon). Delete Cissy. Jay 💬 11:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Struck. Danny (Pokémon) was deleted today. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete considering both Cissy (Pokémon) and Danny (Pokémon) have been deleted. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Zaragas → Ultraman (1966 TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Zaragas" at the target article. This is currently not a helpful redirect as no context is given for this search term at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The character is mentioned in multiple list articles, and there is no single target appropriate. Delete and let readers rely on search. Jay 💬 19:02, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Magular → Ultraman (1966 TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Magular" at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect currently as no context is given for this search term to people who search for it. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The character is mentioned in multiple list and Ultraman-related articles, and there is no single target appropriate. Delete and let readers rely on search. Jay 💬 19:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There appears to be consensus for delete Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Geronimon → Ultraman (1966 TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Geronimon" at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect when no context is provided for people who search this term. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rusalkii (talk) 01:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The character is mentioned in multiple Ultraman-related articles, and there is no single target appropriate. Delete and let readers rely on search. Jay 💬 19:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Pokémon anime characters#Elite Four. Speedily targeting anime character article, where mentioned. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Drake (Orange Islands)Drake (Orange Islands) → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Trainers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Character not mentioned at the target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Aloe (Pokémon) → List of Pokémon characters#Unova Gym Leaders  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Corn (Pokémon) → List of Pokémon characters#Unova Gym Leaders  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Pod (Pokémon) → List of Pokémon characters#Unova Gym Trainers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Renominating a bundle of unmentioned Unova Gym Trainers. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• As follows:
  • Aloe - Delete - no information on enwiki. There is an episode 674 "The Battle According to Lenora!"(Shippō Gym Battle! Vs. Gym Leader Aloe!!) in Pokémon the Series: Black & White. Just in the title, there is no mention in the plot synopsis.
  • Corn - Delete - no information on enwiki. No entry at Corn (disambiguation).
  • Pod - Pod says Pod (Pokémon) is known as Chili, who is mentioned as the brother of Cilan at List of Pokémon anime characters#Unova Gym Leaders. Also Masakazu Morita has given voice to Pod in Pokémon. If neither info is useful, delete.
• Jay 💬 23:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• You had one job → Ocean's Eleven  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Meme based on the movie, not mentioned in target. Rusalkii (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no, it's a line from the movie, and it's by no means exclusive to that. Way too general and vague for any particular target. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 04:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Know Your Meme thinks this phrase's earliest known use is from this film, but whether or not that's true, the phrase is widely used nowadays and is not closely associated with the film. Second choice: soft redirect to wikt:you had one job. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft retarget to wikt:you had one job as my first choice. Seems like a plausible search term, but we don't have an article on this phrase like we do for other idioms, so the best source of information to the user would be wiktionary. Deletion would be my distant second choice. Fieari (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this is not mentioned here. Would not be worth maintaining redirects from quotes as such to wiktionary. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Fun side comment. Just for kicks, I did a little digging, and I found this book from 1901 using this exact phrase in the exact same sense as it was used in Ocean's 11. This strikes me as too wikt:WT:SOP to warrant an entry over there, but those decisions can be pretty subtle, and I don't know if I want to wade into that one. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Google has the year wrong. That book seems to be from 2022, not 1901. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Ugh, well so much for that find. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).