The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hent → Crasna (Tisza)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Henț → Crasna (Tisza)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Reopening Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_19#Henț/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_19#Hent as the sockpuppet's involvement was largely procedural - I was the first to point it out at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_5#Henț_River that these redirects suffer the same problem as those. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete. Google knows "Hent" only as the Middle English word, an abbreviation for hentai, and a track from the Yann Tiersen album EUSA - our article on Tiersen mentions the album, but not the track. There's very little evidence that the word refers to the river - "Hent River" gives us Henty River (in Australia). Tevildo (talk) 12:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Just One More Thing. Jay 💬 14:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Just one more thingJust one more thing → Columbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

mentioned in both columbo and columbo's articles as his catchphrase, and in columbo and peter falk's articles as the name of a memoir (and of an autobiography). opinions? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Columbo (character), per redirects like Don't have a cow, man to Bart Simpson. As for the memoir, the capitalized version, Just One More Thing, should redirect to Peter Falk. -insert valid name here- (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Just One More Thing is a disambiguation page, I vote to retarget to that. -insert valid name here- (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Columbo (character) per precedent, listed above. Fieari (talk) 07:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment a hatnote should be added for One More Thing and Just One Thing and Just One More -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 16:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A disambiguation page has been prepared to use in the hatnote for wherever this ends up pointing to -- Just One More Thing (disambiguation) -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:AINTBROKE. The same origin story is given for the catchphrase in both articles, with basically the same amount of detail. Neither is preferable to the other, and in absence of a reason to retarget, we shouldn't. Agree that the capitalized title of the memoir should go to the actor's bio, per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a do or two has been did, resulting in just one more thing (capitalized) being a dab. assuming said do is not undid, i'll vote to retarget to that dab cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cogsan: your comment above seems to have gotten mangled. Do you want to try restating? Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 23:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  i say what i mean and i mean what i say, and i say retarget to the dab~ cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to the disambiguation page at Just One More Thing. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Clock/calendar → Clock  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

xy? while a lot of clocks are also calendars these days, they're not inherently the same thing, and their relation or lack thereof isn't discussed in the target cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. Calendars aren't clocks. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:XY --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Time#Measurement per WP:XY: it may be possible, however, for such redirects to point to a location in which both topics are discussed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  yeah, but their specific relation also isn't really discussed there cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 23:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What‽ It's absolutely discussed there! One example: In day-to-day life, the clock is consulted for periods less than a day, whereas the calendar is consulted for periods longer than a day. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  if that's in-depth enough in your opinion, then fair enough i guess cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  In-depth has nothing to do with it. The rationale is WP:XY, which is resolved by redirecting to a place both topics are discussed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Deleteish. I think XY is more important here. My gut tells me that this was intended to refer to clocks that have calendars built in, and that the off chance that someone looks for this (especially unlikely given the slash), they're probably looking for that. There's also a deleted Clock calendar page (as OR, via a prod), which might back that up. There's also Calendar Clock Face, but that's kind of a stretch. And there's stuff like Prague astronomical clock, an actual clock that even has a section devoted to a calendar mechanism that it contains. In all, I just don't think there's a good target here, especially given the odd formatting with the slash. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What do you mean by I think XY is more important here? WP:XY supports retargeting, not deletion. Also, that Clock calendar was deleted doesn't back anything up. Someone had posted File:Clock calendar.jpg along with their personal explanation of what it means. That abolutely should have been deleted, but it has no bearing on the redirect at hand. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah, I was a little unclear...by "more important", I mean that I think it's a case of XY without a good retargeting option. That's a fair point about the old deleted article given that image upload. But that gut feeling I was talking about is also backed up by a simple web search, which comes up with endless clocks that have calendar functions built in (which is probably most digital ones at this point). Even if both are technically mentioned where you propose, it's a bit of a stretch that it's actually going to be a helpful target. It's hard to imagine that anyone doesn't know what these everyday items are, and even if they don't, it's also unlikely that they're going to search for them together...with a slash in the middle...unless they're looking for something more specific, like some combination device, which isn't mentioned there. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What I'm getting at is: if you're reading the redirect to mean "something that has the functionality of both a clock and a calendar", that's one thing...but your rationale for deletion then is not WP:XY. WP:XY is explicitly for the intersection of two topics. When there is a target that discusses both topics, which we have in this case, WP:XY says to retarget there. While I disagree with them, arguments such as with "Delete per the formatting" or "Delete because BigTechCo makes a notable gadget with this name", etc. don't have that problem -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:XY. Clocks are devices which measure and read out time; calendars are systems of subdividing and numerating an entire year. Some clocks also read out the date but that does not make them calendars. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  ...and all of that is explained at Time#Measurement. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Time#Measurement per Tavix. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Google search results for this and "clock calendar" give gadgets that give both the day and the time. Apparantly this is one of the names such things go by. I'm lead to support deletion, but not per WP:XY. XY, per Tavix, does not apply; what we have here is a gadget that is not discussed in our encyclopedia. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or refine to Clock#Astronomical. There aren't many people on planet Earth who wake up one day and decide they really want to know the difference between a clock and a calendar, bring up Wikipedia, and are satisfied with such an insightful sentence as In day-to-day life, the clock is consulted for periods less than a day, whereas the calendar is consulted for periods longer than a day. I refuse to believe that that number is anything other than minimal when compared with people who desire information about combined clock/calendars, especially given the usage of the slash. For combined clock/calendars, deletion shows a few good options in the search results, or alternatively Clock#Astronomical has some information (which was presumably the original rationale for this redirect). J947 ‡ ^edits 00:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Cremastra and J947. Oppose retargeting to Time#Measurement per J947. I don't see use in trying to salvage this poor unclear redirect term having a slash. Jay 💬 18:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Heavy.com. Jay 💬 18:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:HEAVYWikipedia:HEAVY → Wikipedia:Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Heavy.com – see WP:HEAVY.COMWP:HEAVY.COM. Current target is a little-used essay, redirect has no incoming links. The perennial sources index would be a much more useful target. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 21:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom; the RSP entry seems a lot more useful, and not only is the shortcut unused, but there don't even seem to be any incoming links to the essay itself in the wild (other than just lists of essays and stuff). If someone really wants a shortcut to the essay badly enough, BOMBER still works I guess. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 21:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom. Much more useful target to editors --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or retarget. Considering it had all of 10 hits last year and is slightly ambiguous, it could be safely deleted, but otherwise, yeah, retargeting is a tiny improvement. Station1 (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Black Mesa Golem Ape → Half-Life VR but the AI Is Self-Aware  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

unmentioned cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The Crumbles (illness) → Half-Life VR but the AI Is Self-Aware  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

unmentioned. some could say ᴛʜᴇʀᴇ'ꜱ ɴᴏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇʀᴇ cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It was a one off joke made by Holly and seems about as useful to keep as Gordon's death in All Dogs Go To Heaven 2

LaffyTaffer (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wario 4 → Wario Land 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

wouldn't it be competing with warioware: touched! for that title? admittedly a weak nom because wl4 is the only one with a 4 plastered on its name cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I created this redirect but I have no memory of it. I think Wario Land 4 sounds more plausible as an expected page than Warioware, but I don't have a strong opinion. Popcornfud (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i guess if you want to be pedantic at the cost of common sense, virtual boy wario land would be the 4rd wario game, and wario land 3 would be the 4st wario land game cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete per nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Chimneybot hat → Top hat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

not entirely sure it's a plausible misspelling of "chimney pot hat" cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Richard L. Doty. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Richard DotyRichard Doty → Mirage Men  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Target page is a documentary film in which Doty is interviewed extensively, but the article says nothing substantive about Doty other than this fact, so the connection seems tenuous. Possible new target is Paul Bennewitz, as Doty is mostly known for his involvement in an alleged clandestine disinformation campaign targeted at Bennewitz. Honestly, I'm on the fence about this redirect; I think that Doty is wikinotable, albeit in association with a WP:FRINGE topic, but creating an article about him is not on my priority list, and I'm not sure whether Mirage Men is an appropriate redirect target in the interim. Carguychris (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Richard L. Doty and remove links from the three first pages here. I agree that the fringe topic Doty may be notable, but there is currently no obvious target article for a redirect from his name. 80.221.186.222 (talk) 11:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doty is certainly wikinotable and I've been tempted to write the article on him but so far as I know, he's still living and I'm not sure a standalone bio on him could pass BLP. because we'd had to add caveats to everything he says about himself. The two obvious candidates for redirect are Mirage Men and Paul Bennewitz. I prefer redirecting to the documentary because Doty consented to participating in it. Strongly opppose redirect to Richard L. Doty, which would just add to confusion. Feoffer (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On further consideration, I've decided to cast my support to redirecting to Richard L. Doty, and creating a placeholder redirect for Richard C. Doty to Mirage Men. we'd had to add caveats to everything [Doty] says about himself—agree, an article about the UFO figure will be tricky because most published information about him is WP:FRINGE, WP:PRIMARY, or both. Carguychris (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Richard L. Doty per 80.221.186.222 - L. is the stronger claimant over someone with only a dubious target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support redirect to Richard L. Doty per @Pppery and 80.221.186.222, until a Richard C. Doty or Richard Doty (government agent) page can be created. A topic with a page trumps a topic that should have one but doesn't yet. Carguychris (talk) 16:21, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 19:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Furry Shadaya → Farai Chideya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nonsensical redirect, why would anyone search for this? 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:B493:3381:6FAD:82D8 (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems like an attempt at a phonetic spelling but can't find evidence this is in use even as a misspelling. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 19:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Furry Happy Monsters → Shiny Happy People  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Seems to be a WP:BLAR from 2006. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:B493:3381:6FAD:82D8 (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 19:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Henry the Hermit → Quest for Glory#Characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 'Enry the 'Ermit → Quest for Glory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus about Clive and Hix and delete the rest. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Alen (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Apple (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Barbarossa Rugner → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Camille (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Clive (Suikoden)Clive (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Gadget (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Gaspar (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Georg Prime → Suikoden V  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Grenseal → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Hix (Suikoden)Hix (Suikoden) → Suikoden (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Humphrey Mintz → Suikoden Tierkreis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

re-nominating those after this discussion closed as "if only we knew the suffering that would befall us next", but only by a small chunk at a time. same rationale applies cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should note that between then and now, mentions for some characters have been added. from an extremely cursory glance, georg is now mentioned in his target, and... that's it for this list, really. still not entirely sure that would warrant a redirect cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Humphrey Mintz too has mention. Jay 💬 16:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nice-a cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Repeating my votes from the previous RfD: Delete if there is no content worth merging, or restore and AfD for these: Alen, Apple, Barbarossa, Camille, Gadget, Gaspar, and Grenseal. Georg and Humphrey have mention, but no opinion on how good they are. Others are {{R from merge}}. Jay 💬 16:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  if it serves as any metric, not a single one of the pre-blar articles from this batch had any reliable sources or info worth keeping out of fandom or tv tropes cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all as evidently nobody cares enough to do anything else. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kattie → Slingshot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

misspelling of "kettie". while plausible enough on its own, results gave me a bunch of other stuff, like sandals and a potentially sort of kind of notable musician cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 12:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. When I created the redirect, the target attested the spelling as "kattie" instead of "kettie". It's still attested that way at Madam & Eve. Other entries would include Kattie B. Screws, Katharine Susannah Prichard, a character in The Bookshop (film), and a ship used by Albert Gallatin. See also entries include Katty (disambiguation) and Catty (disambiguation). -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Foot taboo → Foot#In culture  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

not properly discussed in the target. also a little vague, but that's not much of an issue here cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If a proper discussion of taboos involving feet was added to the culture section, this can be recreated. Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's also ambiguous. It could refer to aversion to foot odor or foot fetishism too. --MikutoH ^talk! 03:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Paul Feiss → Paul M. Fleiss  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Irrelevant typo redirect that does not deserve its own article. Paul Fleiss already exists for this purpose. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misleading. Unlikely misspelling, and the reader might be looking for someone actually named "Paul Feiss". Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There are real people called Paul Feiss and this is misleading. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participation was limited despite a relist, and a wait of almost two weeks after the relist. While the opinions were not strong, there is an understanding that the term owes its origins, or points to the band/album which is the current target. Jay 💬 12:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Adult contemporary progressive death metalAdult contemporary progressive death metal → Colors (Between the Buried and Me album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I don't think this term is unambiguously affiliated with this album. For instance, the first result on Google (for me) was for a band different than that of this album's. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got that, too (I'm assuming from last.fm), but, Between the Buried and Me literally coined the term. Therefore, it makes better sense to redirect to their album. If, and only if, more bands start to identify with this term, and major outlets such as Rolling Stone pick up on it and define it, could we then start an article for this term. Moline1 (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: My Google search results bring up Last.fm and blog sites. While not considered reliable, both list artists other than Between the Buried and Me. However, most sources point to this album. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2.4-dihydroxybenzoic acid → 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misspelling of the correct 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (period instead of a comma). This is confusing as it suggests the numbers relate to some sort of amount, rather than being locants. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 05:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree that it would be confusing if it were in the article, but because it is a redirect it clarifies more than confuses: anyone who thought it was a period would be corrected and brought to the right article with a comma. In this case, deletion wouldn't be beneficial, so keep BugGhost🦗👻 09:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete given the context, of a technical term in a topic-area where technical details of the term matter, I don't see how this specific case is an expected typo. There are thousands of chemical articles with punctuation in their title, doesn't seem worthwhile to envision every possible punctuation-typo. Noting also the dubious-faith creation of it, per the "Persistent creation of unhelpful redirects" reason its creating editor was indef'ed. DMacks (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  We're not debating whether to create redirects for every possible punctuation-typo - just whether it is beneficial to delete this specific one. BugGhost🦗👻 19:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per DMacks. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Chloroquine#History. DMacks (talk) 10:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• SontochinSontochin → 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is the common name of a completely different compound (a methylated derivative of chloroquine) that is not described at the target and for which enwiki does not appear to have any content. Delete to avoid confusion and encourage article creation. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Chloroquine which explains. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be fine with this, but it should be refined to Chloroquine#History. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 05:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Baby gaetzBaby gaetz → Matt Gaetz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nickname not mentioned in the article. Xeroctic (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No idea why this was created in the first place. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Agreed. Kcmastrpc (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I think this is a pun, relating to the baby-gate accusations against Gaetz, concerning underage prostitution -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Nah, it's a nickname for Gaetz because his father was also a state politician. This isn't a vote, this is just me chiming in with an explanation. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 10:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that's something I've forgotten with all the hubbub he's generated over the years. In that case, the redirect should be Baby Gaetz and tagged as {{R from nickname}}. It could be added to the infobox or early career, with several sold RSes, like SCMP[1], BBC[2], etc -- with this one being a {{R from avoided double redirect|Baby Gaetz}} -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 00:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added a mention. Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, as this is now mentioned in the article. – Michael Aurel (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but fix capitalisation. Enix150 (talk) 03:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Zhuhui StadiumZhuhui Stadium → Zhuhai Stadium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misspelled Zhuhai. No usage exept for mirror sites, IP detect sites, and map data sites that probably grabbed data from Wikipedia. WhatLinksHere cleaned.

Zhuhui is another place in China. The first version said it's in Zhuhui, Hengyang, Hunan, China, while coordinates pointed to Zhuhai. It said it opened in 1998 which matches Zhuhai stadium ("建成于1998年10月", built in October 1998). I searched for Zhuhui stadium (google:朱晖体育馆) with no results.

   — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 22:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article was at this title for 13+ years. Thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since no Zhuhui Stadium or a stadium in Zhuhui exist, then weak keep. I can see how someone could confuse the word in Latin alphabet, whether unfamiliar with Chinese or with this alphabet. --MikutoH ^talk! 03:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep, given the name has been used as the title for over 13 years, I guess it is not too harmful to include a redirect with {{R from misspelling}}. Sun8908 _Talk 08:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).