The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yoon Kye-sang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proper references. —AssassiN's Creed ^(talk) 07:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It is the task of the (first) editors to show the notability of the topic. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is the task of editors making comments at AfD to actually be bothered to click the wonderful "find sources" link above and see if there are any WP:RS available which can be used to improve the article. Even in English there are quite a few available. The point of AfD is to determine whether a topic is notable. If you have no useful contribution to that discussion, you should stay out of it. Saying "I searched for sources and couldn't find any" is a reasonable contribution to an AfD discussion, if true (except that in this case it is not). Saying "I see sources but I don't think any of them are non-trivial" is also a reasonable contribution. Saying "article has no sources" is obvious, irrelevant, and a complete waste of everyone's reading time. If all we had to do is decide whether the article had sources, we would not need an AfD discussion and we would use bots instead of administrators to delete articles.cab (call) 15:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. cab (call) 15:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep References added from Korean newspapers. A former member of a popular music group who has himself gone on to starring roles in numerous films and TV shows. cab (call) 15:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A clear case of somebody not reading WP:BEFORE Bgwhite (talk) 07:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The references added since the discussion was opened (WP:HEY) are more than enough to indicate notability. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sources added. Nominator's concerns met. Notability stated and shown through article improvements. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Agree with Bgwhite. — Bill william compton^Talk 11:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - notability has clearly been met. We should not have been having this discussion. LadyofShalott 11:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.