The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close; no comments have been added to this discussion in 7½ years. No prejudice against speedy re-nomination. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey tennis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on information in the current article this game is not notable enough for wikipedia. Thue | talk 14:10, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete, insignificant. -- Solitude 14:53, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: transient, local, insignificant, and the article doesn't even tell us what the game is. Geogre 00:47, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Various Google hits, none of which seem related to this, or encyclopedic any of them. The fact that people mean so many different things by the same catchy phrase suggests to me that none of them are very well known. Andrewa 01:16, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Exploding Boy 01:38, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Nobody is any wiser for having read the page Giano 11:07, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Brequinda 16:24, 20 Jul 2004 (BST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.