Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Pancala - it's a very interesting concept. Substitute "pancala" for "dukkha"in the four truths, and they become much clearer. Add dustha, 'standing unstable', and it's natural: wgen you're caught in endless mind-activities 0 a puppet-theater in which the dead puppets come to life, you's standing unstable, easily knocked down. But when you realise that 'the world' and cravings are contibuously recreated - samsara - then you (can) realize the 'empty mind' an sich. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting, what are you reading this from? wound theology◈ 20:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious that you disagree with the comments made at Talk:Suicide methods. But you need to stop removing other editors' comments even though you dislike them. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WhatamIdoing (talk · contribs), it is standard procedure to remove or strike comments from indef'd users, doubly so for gaudy, bolded WP:DISCLAIMERs. wound theology◈ 04:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a violation of the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines to remove others' comments about the article content in an active discussion. TPG offers us the option (not a requirement) of Removing or striking through comments made by blocked sock puppets of users editing in violation of a block or ban, but If comments are part of an active discussion, they should be struck instead of removed. Ergo, you could <s>strike</s> the comments, but you shouldn't remove them.

I recommend that you just leave it alone, and let the discussion disappear into the archives. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Wound theology,

You're invited to the February 2026 meetup in Portland, Oregon! Join us at the Northwest Library at 2:00 PM on Saturday, February 28.

Please RSVP at the link above, even if you might be interested, so we can know how many people to expect. Hope to see you there!

(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:34, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoroastrianism, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rise of Islam was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]