Would you be good enough to respect the date format of articles when editing? And especially not replace correct format with incorrect. Thank you in anticipation. MapReader (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be appreciated, therefore, if you could edit while respecting WP policy? MapReader (talk) 14:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Douglas Adams, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page And Another Thing....

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Rory O'Donnell, 1st Earl of Tyrconnell, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you continue to insert <nowiki /> tags in your edits? This is very suspicious and continues to break code. If you do not or cannot explain this I will be forced to simply revert your bizarre editing. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:25, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm So the egg is on me... I just actually looked at your edit and I now see why you had to do this. Please forgive me. The mistake was mine. Traditionally this is done a different way so as to avoid using the nowiki tags (which for the record, are often the sign of AI generated content or other vandalism). I am sorry. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:28, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Let me know if there is a correct way to use these tags. Thanks. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 05:35, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm not even sure. There is a way that I like to do it, which is to use the html code for the brackets but this case the mistake was mine... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:39, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I appreciate your recent contributions to the Star Wars page. I have one question though—what is the purpose of linking to the 1997 Special Edition trailer on YouTube? What information does it give the reader that is not in other sources? Thanks, and happy New Year! OrdinaryOtter (talk) 04:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay. I added it because the other citations do not include the full title of the campaign ("The Star Wars Trilogy: Special Edition"). It would be appreciated if another source could be found that includes this info. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flight of the Earls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Boissière.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colin Baker is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 04:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, me again! Just wanted to thank you again for taking on Fury from the Deep; for my part of the season 5 project I plan to do some research on Tomb relatively soon.

Given your interest in improving Tom and Colin Baker recently, I figured I would let you know that two Good Topics on the WP:WHO goals list (Ninth and Fifteenth Doctors) are only a few articles away from completion. Most of them are character articles, which I can hit up since I have some good familiarity with those, and Doctor Who series 15 (Which me and @TheDoctorWho are going to start work on soon). The two big gaps I am ill-equipped to handle are Christopher Eccleston and Ncuti Gatwa, since both are BLPs, which is a topic I'm less familiar with re-writing. Given your fantastic work on rewriting Tom and Colin Baker, would either of the above be of potential interest for a rewrite?

I understand I've already asked you to do Fury, so you have full rights to decline if you're either too busy or want to work on some more non-Who articles, but I figured I'd shoot the question out since either article's improvement would greatly help with the completion of those Good Topics. Since I've asked a lot of you as well, if there's ever anything I can do to make your editing experience easier, whether it be research, copyediting, review swaps, etc, let me know. I'd be happy to assist at any time :). Hope all is well and thanks again on several of your above articles! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:36, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999 Quick note that I am (slowly) working on 15. I did expand the ratings section a few weeks ago, and plan to hopefully start on casting in the next few weeks. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:43, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDoctorWho Ah, that's good to hear! I plan to start hitting up the production and reception sections tomorrow, so expect to see some more from me on that. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 06:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999 No problem. I can take the Christopher Eccleston and Ncuti Gatwa articles to work on. Gatwa's article doesn't have much work to do so should be easy. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 06:58, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated Gatwa's article to GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SkywalkerEccleston Damn you work fast, fantastic work.

I've gone through and subbed out a few unreliables that slipped through the cracks, but there were a few I couldn't track (Namely his parents' names and the info that he has two siblings, which are currently cited to unreliable source Find My Past). Also, the first footnote about his name's pronunciation cites several unreliable sources, though I am admittedly unable to go and edit that since I have no idea how to edit the footnote myself (Me being technologically illiterate strikes again). Wanted to let you know about these before the review so that way these sources were addressed beforehand. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, no problem. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colin Baker has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flight of the Earls Map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article James "Spanish" Blake is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JustARandomSquid -- JustARandomSquid (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hugh McManus O'Donnell, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:31, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Eccleston, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Scott was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on the article, just a few minor things to address. You can access the review here. Thanks. Joko2468 (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Hugh Roe O'Donnell is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joko2468 -- Joko2468 (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 02:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Hugh Roe O'Donnell has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joko2468 -- Joko2468 (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article James "Spanish" Blake has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JustARandomSquid -- JustARandomSquid (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SkywalkerEccleston, I refer to the List of awards and nominations received by John Seale article that you created on 16 February 2026. At the time of NPP review, the article was uncategorised, orphaned, and contained multiple errors in the data presented in the tables. I have made the necessary corrections. I would appreciate it if you could kindly go through the article and make any additional corrections as required. Regards. QEnigma 论 18:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for updating the tables, I didn't know why they had errors. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Claire Foy is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Caffar O'Donnell is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crystalite13 -- Crystalite13 (talk) 00:38, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Maguire (Lord of Fermanagh), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donegal was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Claire Foy has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]