Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Besides PC Gamer, I am not really seeing WP:RS that discuss it in a significant way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Upturned and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work at Rain World. As I said before, it's been a while since anyone other than me went to refine that article, so it's nice to see you. I hope your experience playing Watcher goes amazing, and I expect to see you back after you're finished. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damn that's actually really kind of you, totally forgot barnstars were a thing but that is actually super nice. Honestly you are due for a barnstar too because it is crazy how much work you've done for Rain World's article, and I can't imagine how much time you must've spent editing it; that kind of dedication is impressive. Already having a ton of fun with The Watcher, played it for like nine hours today and its great. Dunno when I'll be past all the spoilers, but when I am I'll be back here to help. Wishing you luck with any edits in the meantime! SapphireBandit(♢) 04:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, for some reason I never got a notification for this, so thank you for all the compliments! As you've been gone, I've been expanding the article by a decent amount and now have surpassed 60% authorship (as in I've written over 60% of the wikitext. I've written like 41% of the prose).

Also, turns out there's barely any reliable sources talking about the expansion, so there happens to be zero spoilers on the article right now. You're free to read it. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 00:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, just read it, looks quite good right now. Too bad about the little sources, though I think you can still add its story to the Plot section if you want to. Either way I should be back to help with all that once I'm done with the game, although that might be a minute haha. Anyways that's all, have a good one! SapphireBandit(♢) 06:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Look Outside Interview Screenshot.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Neverway. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON - the article is a stub with no content with a few sources dumped in the Premise section. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that's my bad, never meant it to be a main article, thought it was still a draft. Wouldn't ever leave it in that quality anyways, gonna be a couple more days until its finished, sorry for the trouble. SapphireBandit(♢) 11:47, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Look Outside you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaguar, thanks for taking the time to do a review, I appreciate the help a lot. Do note that the article's Plot section was added to by a 3rd party recently, bringing it a lot over the general limit of 700 words. Their addition was fair so I didn't want to outright remove it, but it will likely take me at least to the end of today to bring the section back below the 700 word standard, so just keep this in mind if you are planning to do a MoS check today. Anyways that's all, thanks again! SapphireBandit(♢) 10:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Look Outside you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Look Outside for comments about the article, and Talk:Look Outside/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SapphireBandit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Upturned, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SapphireBandit. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Upturned".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how useful this message will be, but I've nominated Rain World for FAC as we planned many months ago and I thought it'd just be fitting to tell you about it. Check it out here if you want. I feel confident that I can pull this off even as a first-time nominator as the article at this point is at the incredibly close to the best that it can be (statistically, newbie nominators only have a 15% chance of succeeding). Good luck on that Look Outside peer review! Toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 23:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh damn that's awesome. Sorry I dont really have time to edit as of late, but goos luck with the nomination! SapphireBandit(♢) 11:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]