Hello, Sailamarja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other projects:

--Gryllida (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sailamarja I have added projects Finland, Chemistry, Biographies, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gryllida, how do I see your addings?

Click the 'talk' tab at the top of the draft. Here is what it opens: Draft talk:Saila Seppo. --Gryllida (talk) 10:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll try to contribute with the pages as much I am able Hey again, I already found 'colloid' in my expertise area. I was not aloud to edit it in English. I found out that the Finnish version of it will need much more material, I will translate from English to Finnish.

Nice. Thank you! You will be able to edit the 'colloid' page after you make 3-4 more edits to other pages (then you become "autoconfirmed"). --Gryllida (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gryllida for introducing me those projects! It is interesting to get involved in their job. Sailamarja (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate how this person meets WP:NACADEMIC, using sources that are not connected to the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saila Seppo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saila Seppo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sailamarja! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sailamarja. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and felicitations. I realize that you stopped editing in 2019, but I'm hoping that your still pay attention to this account. I noticed that you made this edit to "Titanium dioxide", in which you added this reference:

• Anderson, Bruce (1999). Kemira pigments quality titanium dioxide. Savannah, Georgia, USA. p. 39.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

Unfortunately, these days this generates the error above. Additional information about the publication, such as the venue it was published in and any identification numbers would be helpful. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]