Remove the requested move template and the wp:home text. Many people are going to respond based on a glance that tells them you simply want to move Main Page to WP:HOME, rather than read your full proposal. Just a suggestion based on my own experiences. It's up to you though. equazcion ^(talk) 08:23, 22 Sep 2013 (UTC)

• Awaiting further review at Template:Did you know nominations/Transportation in Montana. -- Trevj (talk) 12:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wolf attacks on humans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
10		Quercus calliprinos (talk)						Add sources
58		Core Cities Group (talk)						Add sources
34		Quercus coccifera (talk)						Add sources
50		Action News (talk)						Add sources
48		Fog Bowl (American football) (talk)						Add sources
3		Apollonias barbujana (talk)						Add sources
55		Science and invention in Birmingham (talk)						Cleanup
3		Quercus diversifolia (talk)						Cleanup
3		Aston (Birmingham ward) (talk)						Cleanup
68		Ex Cathedra (talk)						Expand
15		Literature of Birmingham (talk)						Expand
13		Public Finance Balance of Smoking in the Czech Republic (talk)						Expand
774		Fairbanks, Alaska (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
82		Manchester Grammar School (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
11		City wiki (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
6		Museum of the Jewellery Quarter (talk)						Merge
53		Self-insertion (talk)						Merge
7		Ocotea foetens (talk)						Merge
1,660		Anchorage, Alaska (talk)						Wikify
39		Gulf Air destinations (talk)						Wikify
15		Hellenic Duty Free Shops (talk)						Wikify
0		Volare destinations (talk)						Orphan
2		Air Méditerranée destinations (talk)						Orphan
1		Quercus planipocula (talk)						Orphan
2		Best Thames Local (talk)						Stub
5,890		Peaky Blinders (talk)						Stub
117		Holloware (talk)						Stub
10		Birmingham, Alabama (Amtrak station) (talk)						Stub
6		William Gear (talk)						Stub
11		Uniross (talk)						Stub

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey just wanted to let you know I started to help you with your symbol project however I have been met with being reverted on some. Example: Aldershot GO Station. Mike (talk) 14:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

First of all, thanks for helping out. I prefer to do the stations in a more organized way, e.g. working through a list or category, and doing those in an order; currently I'm doing France and then it moves on to the United States and Canada. (See the project page.) Also, it helps if you have a good edit summary showing that all the symbol additions are routine. Mine are here. The project is a little inactive right now, and needs a jump start however that won't be possible for me until the beginning of November. If you would like to continue with the French ones (in order) that would be appreciated, but until I get the phase with Canada set up we shouldn't go jumping in non-systematically. In November I can set up a collaboration. Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 16:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I'll wait for November! Drop me a line when your ready and if you setup what you want to do I can do some of the repetitive manual work. Mike (talk) 16:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:LTE Advanced. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
88		St Ives, Cambridgeshire (talk)						Add sources
24		Hurler (roller coaster) (talk)						Add sources
12		Flashback (Six Flags New England) (talk)						Add sources
12		Shark River (Florida) (talk)						Add sources
4		Marauder's Mayhem (Alton Towers) (talk)						Add sources
4		Little Econlockhatchee River (talk)						Add sources
9		Tutuki Splash (talk)						Cleanup
155		Fire services in the United Kingdom (talk)						Cleanup
440		Islands of Adventure (talk)						Cleanup
47		Lake Apopka (talk)						Expand
23		Lake Jackson (Tallahassee, Florida) (talk)						Expand
18		US Sugar Corporation (talk)						Expand
6		Chassahowitzka River (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
858		Alton Towers (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
109		Beeching cuts (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
12		Lego Technic Test Track (talk)						Merge
16		Unsuccessful Eurovision Song Contest applicants (talk)						Merge
54		Leicester railway station (talk)						Merge
9		Thunderation (talk)						Wikify
1,851		French cuisine (talk)						Wikify
56		Mindbender (Galaxyland) (talk)						Wikify
3		Roller Coaster (Suoi Tien Park) (talk)						Orphan
3		Klondike Gold Mine (roller coaster) (talk)						Orphan
4		Titan (Space World) (talk)						Orphan
11		North Midlands (talk)						Stub
14		Beast (Alton Towers) (talk)						Stub
5		Cosmic Coaster (Worlds of Fun) (talk)						Stub
10		Ben 10 – Ultimate Mission (talk)						Stub
2		Myakkahatchee Creek (talk)						Stub
4		Billy Creek (talk)						Stub

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)