Why do some pages get locked? An no one can edit them? --Familydad7 (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Often to prevent vandalism, disruption or insertion of libellous claims. Contentious topics, topics that fall under editing sanctions or pages frequently vandalised often see increased levels of page protection. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me with a page move as the title no longer makes sense following a DoB updation --ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I ask what page you’re talking about, where you want to move it to and why? Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, its an edit to a DoB for a historic UK soccer player who's page his here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Butler_(footballer,_born_1885)

His DoB is actually some time before in 1877. I have corrected the article and made some other small data changes to the page but it makes no sense for the URL to end _born_1885 when he was actually born in 1877.

As far as I understand it, I can't edit the basic information that creates that page header / URL and would need to move the page to a new one like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Butler_(footballer,_born_1877)

Is that so? ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source for the DoB change? Cheers. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 09:12, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yes, its on the ENFA (English National Football Archive) website but that's paid subscription only https://www.enfa.co.uk/ but I can send you a screen shot if that helps? Thought there doesn't appear to be a way of attaching here? ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there any movement on this? Its still showing with the wrong YoB page reference now?

I have tried doing it myself but don't seem able to. The page reference should contain 1877.

See also here as a source - https://greensonscreen.co.uk/gosdb-players2.asp?pid=131 ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please cite the reliable sources in the article when making any changes, especially in a biography. Additionally, if you are going to move a page, move both the article and the talk page; not just one or the other. Rambley^[who?] 12:33, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rambley

I've updated the #2 source now to reflect the change in YoB.

Have you moved the associated talk page or do I still need to?

Could you possibly give me an brief over view of the differences between a talk page and an article and how to move both, so I know for the future, or direct me to somewhere where i can read or learn about it?

Many thanks

Andy ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore! I think I have successfully resolved this now! ArgyleAndy73 (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I appreciate your help. Do you have any suggestions regarding my submission here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Omkhar_Arasaratnam ? --Uniforn (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, we don't do pre-reviews at AfC - please submit it for review if you'd like feedback. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 10:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new here, I thought I had submitted it? Can you tell me if I did this correctly? It currently appears as "This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review." Uniforn (talk) 10:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Gtecblogger (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:G.tec medical engineering (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I added generic and public known information about the company in this article.

Gtecblogger (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		This is awarded to Rambley for accumulating more than 605.5 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Many people review drafts. You review the reviewers. You peer-reviewed the peer reviewers and supported your fellow Wikipedians. :) This is awarded to Rambley for completing more than 50 re-reviews during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Thank you for your efforts and teamwork! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I want to edit the article "Cuba-Ireland relations", specifically the section "Irish Cubans", because it's including too much irrelevant info and it sounds super opinionated, but it would involve deleting a whole paragraph of an already short article, so I want advise how to go forward. I also need to know how to do those info blocks at the top that are like "This article contains opinionated info" so I can get others' opinion on it. Thanks. --Swaggette (talk) 02:30, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, looking at the section in question I would agree with you. Since the entire section is unsourced, I think you could be bold and remove the section in question. Just make sure to provide a rationale in your edit summary. An even better solution would be to find reliable sources about the topic and write a more neutral, formal take on it.

In terms of templates, you're probably looking for Template:POV or Template:POV section. Guidance on how to use them is on the pages of each template. If you'd like to discuss it further, you can open a new section on the article's talk page to get the opinions of others. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:41, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , can you elaborate on the comments that you left on my draft for PIGPEN hardcore band new article? This is my first time writing an article and I'm still trying to figure it all out. Thanks PIGPEN666 (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in order to establish the subject as notable you need to provide a range of reliable, secondary, independent sources that cover the subject in significant depth. The article currently does not have these. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:18, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rambley,

Thank you for creating Xiu Mutha Fuckin' Xiu: Vol. 1.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

May not meet the WP:NMUSIC criteria and currently a case of WP:TOOSOON?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:49, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’m a bit confused by this; the article cites multiple reliable, in-depth reviews about the album as well as information about its announcement, singles, etc. I agree it can be expanded a bit more but I think it establishes notability sufficiently. More reviews will likely come out today or in the next couple days. How does this fail WP:NMUSIC to you? Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:58, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun Hey, still looking for guidance. Thanks. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 11:49, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rambley. The WP:NMUSIC guideline outlines what counts for notability. The album (and the vast majority of articles on albums that are created on the day of an album's release) doesn't appear to meet any of the listed criteria #2 to #7. An argument could be made that it meets the coverage guideline in #1: The recording has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it. but note that also lists an exception: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about the recording, and all advertising that mentions the recording, including manufacturers' advertising. Looking through the references, I'm seeing minor magazines that have re-published the same content, clearly from a press release. Most of the articles are short, use the same quotes, and just include a track listing. So #1, for me, isn't satisfied either. This is why I said it was WP:TOOSOON - in a few weeks, the album may have charted, in few months, it may have won an award or two. But for me, now, it's non-notable. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:47, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

While I can understand the note about press releases, those sources are only cited for information relating to the album's announcement, release, singles, etc. I would've thought the variety of critical reviews from either sources widely considered reliable (Pitchfork, The Quietus, Clash) and sources I have assessed to be reliable in this context (Flood, Treble Zine, Bandcamp Daily, etc) to be enough to satisfy the criterion. I know the article is a bit short, but I am still working on expanding it content-wise. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:59, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, and no problem. Work away, I won't be nominating it for deletion or anything any time soon! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rambley You rejected my proposal for a new article. Thanks for making a quick decision. I've now created an article on Grokipedia. Cheers Flexdream (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Grokipedia is by no means a reliable source and contains many inaccuracies and LLM hallucinations, but I'm glad you could find somewhere to put the article. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 14:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Ftg3plus4 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Live at the Greek Theatre 1982 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Regarding my rejected submission "Live at the Greek Theatre 1982":

The rejection reason is "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject."

I'm not clear on what sort of coverage is needed to make the subject qualify. I'd think that the AllMusic review alone would meet that condition, and it is one of two articles referenced. That doesn't seem to me to be any less coverage than many album-related articles have.

Can you give a couple examples from other album-related articles of what is needed, and which would be similar to what's in the bulk of other album-related articles? Ftg3plus4 (talk) 13:20, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reliable secondary sources are required to establish notability; we often look for three or more. Discogs is not a reliable source & the DVD source is a primary or self-published source. More articles discussing the album are needed in order to show it is notable. If you'd like some examples of articles that surpass that notability requirement, take a look at Quaristice, Exai or Forever Howlong; all of which I worked on. While drafts are not expected to have the huge amounts of sources these articles, it should give you a good idea of the type of sources we expect for album-related articles. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out a few specific sources/citations in those articles that would be good examples of what you'd say my article is missing? Or does it just need a couple more sources on the level of, say, the AllMusic review? BTW, the Discogs & DVD sources are just there to support some specific details, not to "establish notability." But I'll skip citing them if that would be an improvement.Ftg3plus4 (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Discogs source should be removed entirely, it is not reliable. The articles I've linked all have news coverage about their announcement, their release, information about singles and many reviews from a variety of reliable sources, all of which establishes they are notable. You need to add more reliable, secondary sources that cover the topic in significant depth. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have added more sources to the article and no longer reference Discogs or the DVD itself. I also removed references to the Japan 2CD as I couldn't find a source for it other than Discogs. Overall the article should be much improved now. Thanks for your input. Ftg3plus4 (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing at the moment. Trying to understand the new article process. --BSD1979 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Your first article has more information. Rambley^[who?] 21:35, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I wanted to ask about something. I was planning on editing the article RimWorld, but felt I should add a source.

Is another wiki an acceptable source for Wikipedia? In specific, it's https://rimworldwiki.com/wiki/Mental_break. --Womginx (talk) 10:04, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Other wikis are considered WP:UGC and are thus unreliable. Rambley^[who?] 14:13, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

... is pretty much unreadable on a white background. Please see WP:SIGAPP. Would you mind changing the color to be more legible? Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:18, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I apologise, I work primarily on dark mode where the signature appeared to be more readable. I've changed the colours - let me know what you think. Rambley^[who?] 09:13, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely looks better! I think there's a way to make the colors different in light and dark mode, but I don't know how it works. Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rambley, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:38, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was trying to edit the Spanish Cobras page but it is locked. I contributed to the page years ago by adding to the “further reading” section, the “territory” and the introduction, but people have edited it and added incorrect founding dates and history. Can you help me edit it please and show me how to use the proper references so this doesn’t happen again? --Recondo85 (talk) 20:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page in question is only semi-protected. Those with accounts older than 4 days and more than 10 edits can edit the page. If you make some useful edits to other articles, you should be able to edit the page in question yourself. Rambley^[who?] 20:33, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Can I contact you in case I need help with the references? Recondo85 (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to leave messages on my talk page if you need help with referencing, yes. Help:Referencing for beginners should help. Rambley^[who?] 20:47, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Quaristice is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monkeysmashingkeyboards -- Monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I made my account not only to help this awesome project that Wikipedia sure is, but also to find answer to one thing. Some time between May of 2021 and November 2023 I read the wiki article about text adventure game named Zork. There was and still is a sentence saying that the name Zork was derived from MIT jargon for unfinished program. The source for the article today is New Zork Times, The - Vol. IV No. 1 page 7 where truly this information is confirmed by games' creator in interview. However, in the time interval I was reading it, I ended up on source Down From the Top of Its Game: The Story of Infocom, Inc. by Hector Briceno, Wesley Chao and others, which does not have this information at all. I checked the edits from that time but I haven't found any mention of this source. My questions: -Can the edit history be manipulated? Some edits just deleted? -Maybe I missed something. Is there any other way how to check the edits except for manually checking each entry? --David.Polakovic (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

how to create page ? --Jackyja1ckyjacky (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Your first article Rambley^[who?] 19:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How do i link a citation? --Lauriemaita (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Referencing for beginners Rambley^[who?] 22:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I recently edited a page using a temporary account then I opened my own personal account. Is there any way I can transfer that edit to my new account so I can keep track of it? --RayKnight51 (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately edits cannot be transferred between accounts; you could add the page to your watchlist and get notified of any new changes, though. Rambley^[who?] 12:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll try that. RayKnight51 (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,what process can I edit song certification and artist profile --Don aji27 (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To edit a page, simply press the "Edit source" button at the top. Rambley^[who?] 09:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

whicj button?

I meant the process,step by step Don aji27 (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is an "Edit source" button on the top of every Wikipedia article you can use to make changes. I'm unsure what you mean by "process"; you simply edit an article, make the desired changes and publish them. Rambley^[who?] 09:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mentor, it's been a long time since I have written to you, since my last message in February 2025, when I first registered here.

I will be glad if you kindly clear my doubts about awards

Regards and thanks for your time

:D Rupmoy (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, would you kindly expand on what you mean by badges? If you mean barnstars, those are given to you by other users for good editing. Rambley^[who?] 12:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the Registered Editor award Rupmoy (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards can just be added to your user pages, you don’t automatically get them. If you meet the requirements, just add the template. Rambley^[who?] 13:22, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you pls tell me what more requirements I will need to get my first badge 😔? Rupmoy (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you can just add service awards to your user page yourself. You don't get them granted automatically. I believe the next award after Registered is Novice, which requires 200 edits and 1 month of service. Rambley^[who?] 13:44, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ohh thanks, I added it and now it works Rupmoy (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the Registered Editor award Rupmoy (talk) 13:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

how do I find an article that needs editing --Nahidontfeellikeit (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just finished an article and have submitted it for review. Do you have access to it and if so what comments can you make? --Feilxpo29 (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any relation to Draft:Alex Pudmann? Both your draft and the linked draft feature the same subject and the latter was created by the article's subject themselves. In any case, it is best to work on the one draft rather than creating and submitting multiple versions. Rambley^[who?] 01:06, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rembly, I did both of these drafts that you are talking about. I'm not related to Alex Pudmann in any way. I feel that he should have a Wikipedia page, as he is rising star in the classical music world. The last draft that you saw is the updated and final version. ~2026-81100-0 (talk) 01:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you're signed in whenever making edits. In any case, you should just be editing the main draft for Pudmann and resubmit it when you're ready. Rambley^[who?] 09:12, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rambley. I wonder what is the status of the Alex Pudmann draft? I submitted it a couple of weeks ago. Thanks Feilxpo29 (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The version at your sandbox (User:Feilxpo29/sandbox) has not been submitted. The other draft, Draft:Alex Pudmann, has been declined but not resubmitted. Rambley^[who?] 01:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on Publish when I finished the draft in the sandbox. That version is the one I want submitted. Can you tell me what I have to do to submit it?

Thanks Feilxpo29 (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:AFCREVIEW, though it will likely be declined as a duplicate of the other draft about Pudmann. I would recommend you just edit that one as it's about the same subject. Rambley^[who?] 20:10, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Rambley. In the wikipedian infobox there is a thing to view current time of the user using the refresh button. So I am wondering is there any way to do that with the number of edits

Thanks for your time mentor

:D Rupmoy (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The best solution is to enable XTools in your preferences, which will show the creator of pages under the titles with their edit count. You can then just check your user page and you'll see the edit count. There is no userbox for this though, I'm afraid. Rambley^[who?] 09:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ohhh thanks 💯 for the tip rambley, hey but can u give on Userboxes in my user page 📃 📃 Rupmoy (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused about the question. Rambley^[who?] 12:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i mispelled it, can u please give a guide on how to use and add Userboxes in my user page? Rupmoy (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Userboxes. Rambley^[who?] 16:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude 😎 Rupmoy (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Rambley. I noticed that you added a "sources exist" tag to the Wilted EP article, and I am contacting you because I am having difficulty finding such sources. I searched for major charts and reviews, but I could only find niche secondary sources, namely POWERMETAL.de, Swiss Metal Magazine, and rocknloadmag. I would appreciate your feedback on the quality of the sources cited and any material you may have found. Thank you in advance. Jvbpds (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3]. There exists a review from Metal Hammer as well, though it is print only. [4] could also be of some use. Rambley^[who?] 20:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I took notes on all the sources and even found the online version of Metal Hammer magazine that you mentioned (issue 410) and have already purchased it. I also intend to use it as the basis for the "critical reception" section that I will be creating. Regarding the references I cited, do you think it would be worthwhile to add any of them? Thank you for your help! Jvbpds (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All of the sources you've cited in the article currently are considered reliable (which is good!) and are fine for the purposes of writing about the album's release history and etc, though press releases and announcements don't help towards notability (WP:PRSOURCE); reviews do. In regards to the other sources you mentioned in your first message, I had a look and none of them have clear editorial policies or lists of writers. While they may be okay for the occasional fact if you can't back a claim up with any other source, I would still avoid them if you can.

In addition, check out WP:RSMUSIC; it hosts a huge list of music-related sources that are considered reliable and unreliable by the community. Very helpful for writing future music-related articles. Rambley^[who?] 00:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Then I will only use the sources you indicated to create the critical reception section. Thank you so much for your support! Jvbpds (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, @Rambley! I added the critical reception and removed the tag you had put on the article The Wilted EP. I would appreciate it if you could review the section. Jvbpds (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, though I'd potentially revise it a little bit to make it slightly more neutral. Maybe I'm nitpicking, though. Rambley^[who?] 13:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I agree. Although the reviews talk about success, I think I ended up overemphasizing this point, which makes the section less neutral. I will make corrections later! Jvbpds (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Richard Lépine. I’m a retired academic based in the USA. I’m a frequent and eclectic “recreational” Wikipedia user. For the first time, I encountered a footnote that displayed in red font, and when I looked at it, I found that the citation had the wrong title: I was able to find the correct one by searching the author name. I am ready to learn how to take the next step in editing. --Richard Lépine (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Lépine Help:Introduction is a good start. Rambley^[who?] 20:59, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to create a page about a musical artist who has produced notable music and has publicly available information. --Robinxafro (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing about a school district, Norristown Area School District. I want to use the student-ran and operated but school-affiliated newspaper known as the Wingspan. Since the school allows them to host meetings in the building, could that count as a conflict of interest, despite negative articles made about the district? --WalterFish (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rambley! While looking at your userpage, I noticed that your good topic topicon is broken. It links to Wikipedia:Featured topics/Black Country, New Road studio albums, which does not exist. I believe you were trying to link to Wikipedia:Featured topics/Black Country, New Road discography instead? Toadspike [Talk] 18:48, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing, because I sure didn't! Should be fixed now. Rambley^[who?] 18:54, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Quaristice is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSK -- MSK (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Quaristice has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSK -- MSK (talk) 18:01, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looking higher up on this talk page and in your archives, it seems some mentee questions aren't being answered.. If you still want to be a mentor, please attempt to respond to questions more actively, otherwise you can resign or mark yourself as away via Special:MentorDashboard. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:20, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have set myself to away, thanks. Rambley^[who?] 08:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]