On 27 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Breyten Breytenbach, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 04:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Plifal! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, really nice work on the Only Yesterday article so far! If you're interested in working on Ghibli-related articles on Wikipedia, I would suggest joining the task force. There are a few other editors who've worked in these areas signed up there — it has been dormant for a while, but that, of course, can change. If you ever need a hand editing in these areas, feel free to reach out! I'm usually around chipping away on one of my projects and I'd be happy to help where I can. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69 ahhhhhhh thank you!!! ;-;

thank you for cleaning up the page too! i've mostly been focused on kurosawa (trying to do more with drunken angel and dersu uzala) but i plan to continue working on only yesterday + other articles somewhat, it'd be nice to coordinate more with yourself (and others). please bear with me and my mistakes!! よろしくお願いします！！--Plifal (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jarinko Chie (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jarinko Chie (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jarinko Chie (film) and Talk:Jarinko Chie (film)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jarinko Chie (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jarinko Chie (film) for comments about the article, and Talk:Jarinko Chie (film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jarinko Chie (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that director Isao Takahata reportedly stayed overnight at a doss-house to ensure that the Japanese animated film Jarinko Chie accurately depicts the city of Osaka? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jarinko Chie (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jarinko Chie (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please use normal punctuation in edit summaries; see WP:EDITSUMMARY. Unusual punctuation his a greater chance of triggering various filters. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

understood, this is not an issue as far as i'm concerned. thanks again!--Plifal (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article High and Low (1963 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plifal, I have a scan of the chapter from Chang's book, but I need a way to get it to you. I cannot simply post it on Wikipedia or Commons because it is copyrighted material.

I use a privacy email forwarder to hide my real email ID, so you can email me from that function from my user page, or go to Special:EmailUser/Peaceray, or directly at peaceray@duck.com. You may wish to set up your own email ID at duck.com to provide a measure of privacy for Wikipedia.

Please see Wikipedia:Emailing users for more detail. Peaceray (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray, thank you so much for doing this!! unfortunately i'm hospitalised right now, but i'll be sure to email you soon. thanks again!--Plifal (talk) 01:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, I am sorry to hear that. I hope that you get better soon. I will watch for your email. Peaceray (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray, thank you for sending it! i received it and it seems to open ok!! i'm doing ok, now discharged but still recovering. if you get the chance, i can of course recommend the film!!! once again i hold a deep appreciation for your assistance. please let me know if there's anything i can do to repay it in kind.--Plifal (talk) 08:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your improvements to Japanese cinema articles are repayment enough! Peaceray (talk) 16:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article High and Low (1963 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:High and Low (1963 film) for comments about the article, and Talk:High and Low (1963 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the detailed feedback!

--Adelequested (talk) 07:55, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey, no worries! if you have any questions or anything, please let me know!--Plifal (talk) 11:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mind me, I was just browsing articles in my watchlist and randomly clicked on your userpage, I really like the usage of third person commentary and lowercase letters! (like myself :p) Makes for a really unique page that I haven't seen much of, but thats kind of all lmao

~eticangaaa (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eticangaaa, aaaaaaaaaahhhh thank you!!!! it's so cute and fluffy!!!! i appreciate your vigilance on that article!!!--Plifal (talk) 08:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High and Low (1963 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the release of High and Low, director Akira Kurosawa received telephone calls imitating his film that threatened to kidnap his daughter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/High and Low (1963 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, High and Low (1963 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say great work on getting my favorite Kurosawa to GA! I wish I had seen this before. Cheers! Remsense ‥ 论 21:46, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, ahhh thank you! ;_; that means a lot. you probably don't remember but we've interacted a few times on the meiji restoration and other pages, and i highly respect your opinion as an editor.

currently there's a peer review open as i'm seeking to take high and low to featured article status. if you have the time and the inclination, i would very much appreciate any additional comments you have. thank you again for your kind words!--Plifal (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you also! As you can see, I spent a bit of time tweaking things I'm of a disposition to notice. If you have questions about any, please let me know! Remsense ‥ 论 01:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, i think i understand the implementation for the policy, it will just likely take me a while to pick up where i missed it and incorporate it more. as such i'm very appreciative of the time you take to fix such mistakes. the only thing i will query is the mdy format, but that's not a big deal! thank you for reaching out and offering your support!!-Plifal (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeWake was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that biographies requires significant coverage about the individual or subject in several independent, reliable sources. For this purpose, interviews, passing mention, or coverage of something they participated in may not meet the criteria if the sources are not about the individual itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Sheen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeWake (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plifal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeWake (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Sheen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 12:13, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article One Wonderful Sunday is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article One Wonderful Sunday has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 17:26, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You've been very active on this article recently - thanks. Could you sort out a couple of discrepancies it now has? Firstly, you added the 'Use British English' template a few weeks ago, which is fine with me as a Brit, although I haven't reread the article to check for British useage. Secondly, however, it also has 'Use mdy dates'. As far as I know, it's not a rule but generally people use dmy dates with British English. There are now some date formatting discrepancies:

• Infobox says "27 April 1948"
• Lead and Production say "March 10 1948", without a comma after the 10
• Theatrical says "April 27 1948", without a comma after the 27
• Bibliography entries use mdy format

I'll leave it to you. I don't mind whichever way you decide (with a slight preference for British + dmy throughout). Masato.harada (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Masato.harada, sure! i just used what was already present (with mistakes arising from habit). iirc the prose was inconsistent beforehand so i decided to use british english since i default to that, and mdy was used so i'm planning to stick to that too, whereas e.g. high and low (1963) used inconsistent engvar and dmy dates so i defaulted to breng and dmy, and rhapsody in august (1991) used ameng and mdy so i'm defaulting to that. apologies for the inconsistencies as they occur. i plan to clean it up, but since i'm going through the article to write it thoroughly, it's not a priority for me. equally if you would like to change it i don't have any qualms about it, engvar and dates don't matter much to me so long as it's generally consistent and agreed upon. thank you for your oversight!!!--Plifal (talk) 17:03, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tightrope Award
		Here's the prestigious Tightrope Award for good balance! (The image represents the amazing Charles Blondin carrying Jimbo Wales safely across the Niagara Falls.)

—LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 09:45, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you're far too kind when i really am undeserving! thank you so very much!!--Plifal (talk) 03:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Nejishiki is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 18:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Nejishiki has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panpan girls, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some Japanese sex workers after World War II organised their own self-defence groups? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panpan girls. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Panpan girls), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		For your work bringing High and Low to GA status and hopefully to FA status despite having an edit count below 1,500. Jon698 (talk) 02:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you kindly!!--Plifal (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nejishiki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nejishiki was a manga with a following among the 1960s avant-garde movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nejishiki. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nejishiki), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plifal; Thanks for your ping about High and Low. You have mentioned an interest in Japanese film on Wikipedia and I'm wondering if this might extend to Korean-oriented film titles. I've placed a new nomination to KPop Demon Hunters for FAC as a popular culture film. I'm wondering if it is worth my asking if you might add a review to the FAC review for this film, and then I'd offer to do the review for your current FAC nomination or one of your GA nominations after you are done. Does it sound interesting? ErnestKrause (talk) 03:15, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ErnestKrause, ahh thank you! it's an appealing offer, but i would prefer to go through the fac process a couple of times before i start offering comments, so i'm afraid i'll have to decline. if you would like to do a gan qpq though i'd be open to that! let me know whenever and whatever would work!!--Plifal (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fellow editor. I have noticed your nomination for Kurosawa's 1950 film Scandal, and have given it a brief glance. There is an issue that you should note, Rotten Tomatoes' consensus is well below the threshold of 15 reviews and should be removed from the article. I have come across this issue before when being reviewed in the past, having only a few reviews there does not provide an accurate consensus of the film, so I advice to search for different sources. If you have additional questions about this and other articles, let me know. Paleface Jack (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paleface Jack oh, thank you! i wasn't aware of this actually. is there a guideline/rfc that you can point me to? should have fixed the issue now. thanks again!--Plifal (talk) 10:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to look at that again. I had to remove the citation from Begotten since there was only 10 reviews it was polling from. The same issue is applied to Scandal because of the limited reviews on Rotten Tomatoes really does not show, one way or the other, the films critical response. Paleface Jack (talk) 16:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plifal! Regarding your recent message, I have a question about how I should go about adding/updating Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic data for movie articles. Do you recommend I follow the basic wording found at WP:AGG (its examples are below), while not using the templates (this one and this one) to do so? I just want to make sure I'm understanding things correctly!

• On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 41% based on 224 reviews, with an average score of 5.4/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Though it begins with promise, Hancock suffers from a flimsy narrative and poor execution."
• At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average rating, the film has received an average score of 49 out of 100, based on 37 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".

Thanks for your help! Null morpheme (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Null morpheme, it should be down to what works for the article! WP:AGG is a user essay, meaning it's the opinion of only one user, and can reflect best practice and can not. in general i would always encourage using prose over the templates, but would avoid using phrasing such as "mixed or average reviews" when only referring to one review aggregator website. you can include the information in any way you think best suits your needs, don't feel bound by that specific wording (i didn't at high and low) :) --Plifal (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it; Thanks again for your help! Null morpheme (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 22:17, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Plifal! It's been lovely seeing the caliber of your work improve from its already-excellent state at the beginning of the year. I'm excited to see what's coming next! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:26, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you're being far too complimentary!—but thank you so much!! likewise for you! knowing me probably more takahat and kurosawa ^^; --Plifal (talk) 22:52, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for all of your hard work!!! it's a pleasure of mine. :) --Plifal (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Plifal! The article you nominated, High and Low (1963 film), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting High and Low to WP:Featured article status! I hope to see more of your articles at WP:FAC in the future. TompaDompa (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TompaDompa, i've said it before but i'll say it again: thank you!!! it wouldn't have gotten half as far without your extended help and guidance! my plan is to take on seven samurai next, which will present a whole new set of challenges, but i look forward to what awaits. please let me know if there's anything i can do in return!!--Plifal (talk) 13:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suppose that gives me a reason to rewatch the film. I'm looking forward to it. TompaDompa (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Rhapsody in August is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actuall7 -- Actuall7 (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Rhapsody in August has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actuall7 -- Actuall7 (talk) 07:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to comment say your great work on all the Kurosawa films is not going unnoticed. I'm glad to see so many Japanese cinema articles being brought up to snuff. Happy New Years! Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzejbanas, thank you kindly, i'm very glad to be contributing!! likewise, thank you for all your work on important classic and genre films!--Plifal (talk) 05:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dersu Uzala (1975 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review of the Akira film article. I will take your notes and work on improving the article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ktkvtsh, you're welcome! i'm sorry to have failed it, it will be quite a heavy undertaking. i'm happy to help facilitate the research, remember to check google scholar, wikipedia library, jstor, project muse etc. for more academic papers.--Plifal (talk) 05:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'm happy to get your notes. Gives me a path forward. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dersu Uzala (1975 film) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dersu Uzala (1975 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Seven Samurai! It is mostly B-class. However (and this may seem nit-picky), there is a {{cn}} tag in the "Remakes" section that needs to be addressed. There should not be any unaddressed maintenance tags in a B-class article, otherwise it is not B-class. That one line either needs a source or it should come out (rather than assess it as C-Class). I looked at Alamat ng 7 kilabot for a possible source, which was not helpful. The only source there mentioning Seven Samauri was not citeable, which is OK for that article (as Start-class), but would not be OK for a B-class article. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Butlerblog, oh apologies, i pre-empted myself a little bit. i was actually searching for a source when i received this message. i decided to excise it, i can't find any references to it and it's probably undue anyway. should i see it come up in a better source i'll re-add it.--Plifal (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - and no apologies necessary! I just happened to notice it, and I thought it was more constructive to reach out than it would have been to revert or re-class the article. Good work on the article! ButlerBlog (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thank you kindly!! and for your own contributions!--Plifal (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Seven Samurai. In your most recent edit, you added the sentence "This occurred until the Toei Company—the studio most associated with the genre—continued to see a high profit margin until the releases of Yojimbo (1961), Sanjuro (1962), and the Japanese release of The Magnificent Seven in the early 1960s."^[1] I'm not sure I understand it - should it start "This continued, since the Toei Company..."? Also, there are too many "until"s at present. I'll let you sort it out.

Masato.harada, apologies, a lapse in my proofreading when recently editing it down. the newest edit should rectify any misunderstandings.--Plifal (talk) 10:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhapsody in August, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a pre-order ticket campaign for Rhapsody in August saw ¥300 of the ¥1,300 ticket price go to the assistance of birds affected by the Gulf War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhapsody in August. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rhapsody in August), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

JuniperChill (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Drunken Angel is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Drunken Angel has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Seven Samurai is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Seven Samurai has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Seven Samurai has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]