Hey this is my talk page

Hello, Ozan33Ankara. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. IAmAtHome (talk) 10:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Umayyad conquest of Hispania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Leon and Talavera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thumama ibn Ashras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumama ibn Ashras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  23:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The map is user generated and not published by academic sources cited, please look at the pink map in the 19th century, where Portugal defines its borders with the English and Germans.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map

The sources do not mention the Omanites in Mozambique, the sultan was in Zanzibar but Cabo Delgado has had a permanent presence of Portuguese since the 15th century.

The map painting of the interior for more than 100 kilometers to the interior of Africa remains unclear, when there are no sources mentioning any influence other than the coastal presence.--Hugo Refachinho (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Baseer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Baseer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozan33Ankara. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tharia Topan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ozan33Ankara! Your additions to Draft:Rawwad b. Muthanna have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, that was hastiness on my part, will rewrite the draft to include more original wording. Diannaa Thank you. --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rawwad b. Muthanna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 22:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the consensus of the Wikipedia community, you have been topic-banned from the topic of ethnicity, broadly construed. You can find directions on how to appeal this topic ban at WP:UNBAN. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:28, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @The Bushranger:,

What exactly is the scope of this ban? That has not been made clear. They said Arab but does that mean I am still allowed to contribute to Islamic history articles. The boundaries need to be clearly defined. Your link doesn't define it properly. Could you please clarify how long this ban will last. And if I appeal in the future who is to say the same users who worked together to get me topic banned will not simply do the same again. --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 10:20, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The scope of the ban is ethnicity. Islamic history is okay to edit. Whether or not someone was of any specific ethnicity is not. The ban is of indefinite duration. Appealing should be done after six months. I would strongly suggest not implying that there is a conspiracy against you, by the way, and note that speculation about whether there is "coordination" or use of "random IPs" without evidence can be considered a personal attack. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is completely fine. Thanks for replying. --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Apaugasma, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Samaale, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say.

Please also have a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. On Wikipedia we summarize reliable sources, we do not write down our own point of view and then try to back it up with reliable sources. Thanks, ☿  Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Apaugasma:, next time check the sources of Gunther Schlee and Jimale instead of accusing me of making up fake genealogies, but I will quote them in the talk page and tag you. Also I actually restored an old edit which has been plagiarised ever since. --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 11:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If a genealogical table has been published by Schlee or Jimale, we can add it next to Obbink's one. Be sure to refer to the number of page in which the table can be found. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 15:31, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Coffee has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, thought you almost meant I couldn't use that source, but you mean I copied it directly, i can't remember doing that. I'll check how I can reword it better. Thanks

Oh you meant in the quote section of the citation? --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to my edit. You can see by my edit summary that I thought it might be an attempt at a quotation. In the future. if your citation includes a quote from your source, you need to include quotation marks, or use the |quote= field in the citation template. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tharia Topan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ozan33Ankara:

I noticed that you reverted some of my edits on the article History of coffee. I couldn't find the reason in your edit summary, so I went here to ask you. As I am quite inexperienced and currently focus on copyedits or other beginner-level tasks, I would like to know if I am doing something wrong, so it doesn't "spread" to other articles. Thanks for your time.

--Bor Q.H. (talk) 10:37, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bor Q.H.,

It was mainly related to the edits made by the user SouthernResidentOrca. They had removed a significant amount of cited content. I noticed that your edits were mostly rephrasing rather than removing information, so you are welcome to reintroduce that content. :Reverting to the version before their edits was simply the most efficient way to restore the material.--Ozan33Ankara (talk) 10:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ozan33Ankara,

Thanks for clarifying your reasoning. Maybe you could in future manually re-add the content you felt was good or revert the other edit, rather than reverting an unrelated edit? Thank you. --Bor Q.H. (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thanks --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 10:57, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since the Banu Hilal and Khorasani Arabs are ethnic groups, these edits [1][2][3] are breaching your topic ban on ethnicity, broadly construed. In this edit [4] you are again writing about a forefather. Please stop editing on anything related to descendants and ancestors, as well anything else related to ethnic groups, broadly construed.

Given that your topic ban was put in place as a consequence of you "pushing an Arab origin" [5], writing about the "Arabian home" of coffee [6][7] is also a bad idea. Please just stay away from anything related to 'Arabness', whether of people or things. Next time I will report you; consider this your final warning. Thanks for taking this into consideration, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Apaugasma, I wasn’t aware that I couldn’t edit pages about Arab figures or Arab dynasties. I thought the restriction mainly applied to disputes over the ethnicity of historical figures, especially where there was disagreement among editors. Does this mean I’m not allowed to create new articles about Islamic figures of Arab origin? That’s an area of particular interest to me, along with broader Islamic history.

Regarding my recent edit to the Coffee page, it was based on the scholarly consensus and the topic is Coffee. I can provide several academic sources to support this. I didn’t think it would fall under the scope of the restriction. My apologies if I misunderstood.

The Bushranger, could you please share your thoughts on this as well? --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 00:13, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can see both sides of the argument here. I would suggest asking for clarification on WP:AN. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic figures of Arab origin should be fine as long as the fact that they are Arab is not central to their notability. With Islamic figures who merely happen to be Arab (and uncontroversially so) it should be possible to write about them without expanding on their lineage or ethnic origins. In the rare case where sources do expand a little on that topic, you could leave it out from the article, and someone else will probably add it later.

The coffee topic is admittedly an edge case, but you should know that the origins of foods and beverages are often a flash point for ethnic disputes on Wikipedia. Here you are already having an argument with a seemingly Africa-focused editor on the relative merits of Ethiopia, Somalia and Yemen in the invention of coffee. That is likely to be understood as falling under your topic ban.

My advice is to stay away from anything where Arab origins could potentially be under dispute. That should be clear enough. However, as The Bushranger said, you can always ask for further clarification on WP:AN. Have a good weekend, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 09:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozan33Ankara. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aben Abou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]