Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:35, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell Thank you AlphaCore talk 22:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alphacore,

Thank you so much for taking the time to review my Draft:Sarah Pribis page earlier this month and for providing that helpful feedback. It really means a lot to me as I'm still learning the ropes of Wikipedia editing.

Following your suggestion, I've removed the YouTube interview sources and added references from Business Insider along with a couple from newspapers to strengthen the sourcing.

Since I'm quite new to creating articles like this, I would be incredibly grateful for any additional gentle guidance you might offer. I'm a bit nervous about resubmitting for review right now, as I'd hate for the draft to be deleted if it's still not quite ready. If possible, I'd love some more pointers first to help get it into better shape.

Thank you again for your patience and understanding, I truly appreciate your help!

Best regards, Sea2Sky Sea2sky (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sea2sky Hey,

Ref 11 and 21 are still YouTube links. Please remove them.

I also felt that there is too much details, add details that needed. Refer WP:CONTENT, WP:BLP and WP:NPOV.

Happy editing! AlphaCore talk 11:12, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AlphaCore. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Katie^talk 17:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 20:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aww!! Thank you :)

HAAAAAPPPPPPY NEWWW YEARRRR @Volten001!!! AlphaCore talk 21:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome and nice time! Cheers! Volten001 ^☎ 15:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AlphaCore, i have worked on this page, rewritten the sections.and added few citations. can you please review and suggest me any corrections i need to make ? I am a beginner, loving to learn about Wikipedia. Before submitting for review, i fear of getting drafted again, i felt it better take your guidance and make it better before submitting it. please guide me to make it wikipedia compliance. Hirematviru (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hirematviru Hey, sure I can help you with that.

Are you the author of this draft Draft:Rachika Suresh? AlphaCore talk 12:49, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@AlphaCore, no i am not the first publisher, it is my friend kalyani. my friend and I together worked on the article. as to learn and grow on wikipedia we searched for many topics to work, and since we found one of the topic to work, we started to work together. i can add her on this for further learning, if you agreed. Hirematviru (talk) 05:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hirematviru Refer WP:RSPLIST and WP:ICTFSOURCES for reliable sources.

WP:NMODEL for the spcial notability guideline for model and refer WP:GNG as well.

If you are directly connected with the subject you should disclose as per WP:COI and if you are working with multiple accounts see WP:SOCKPUPPET and act immediately to avoid getting blocked as multiple accounts aren’t allowed except some cases.

Feel free to ask! AlphaCore talk 12:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@AlphaCore thank you for these links, i have referred and understood how the process is. as i read the WP:NMODEL i understood more clearly. just for clarity o what i understood is right, this person attended good number of stage performances, or other notable productions (Times fashion week) and she was crowned Miss India Teen 2023 and Top 20 finalists of LIVA Miss Diva 2025. this fulfil the requirement?

WP:SOCKPUPPET no, i am not using multiple accounts i hardly able to manage this my first account.

WP:COI no, i am not direct family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships.

WP:GNG I understand it is going right.

WP:RSPLIST and WP:ICTFSOURCES I understand for reliable sources.

For me it feels like a little more improvements needed this article. but can you guide me what else I need to improve it please Hirematviru (talk) 08:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Need more reliable sources to establish notability. Once you feel good to go, submit for review. AlphaCore talk 13:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Alphacore. We are letting you know that Draft:Goodman CK/CKL has been moved to Draft:Goodman Mfg. CK/CKL. Please note that Draft:Goodman CK/CKL was deleted. This was done under CSD G7 because it was a redirect which points to CKL. It was originally a draft that you declined. Anyways, I have significantly improved my draft and added references.

Draft:

Thanks. BilltheBison (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Copy that @BilltheBison AlphaCore talk 01:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is awarded to AlphaCore for accumulating more than 168 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:36, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav

Thank you:) AlphaCore talk 16:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]