Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Max, I saw your vote at the RM and first I want to say that I do hear the general sentiment you are expressing. But I have to implore you to edit out any parts of it that could reasonably be construed to be a personal attack on any other editor. I’m asking you to do this because I think it’s in your interest and in the interest of the discussion. Mikewem (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Klaus Reichenbach has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterfulNerd -- MasterfulNerd (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Klaus Reichenbach has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex26337 Thanks for the notice, but since my initial GAN, the article has been substantially amended by other editors, so I don't think I even qualify anymore because of my low authorship % by now. I also haven't renominated the article for GA status. So, I am the wrong addressee I think. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxwhollymoralground: Alright. On the page's statistics, it says you have authored nearly half of the page, but regardless of that percentage, would you like to withdraw the nomination? — Alex26337 ^(talk) 22:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Hans-Joachim Böhme has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Hans-Joachim Böhme has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Klaus Reichenbach has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Günter Sieber is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Surayeproject3 -- Surayeproject3 (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Günter Sieber is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresentlySuraye3 -- PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bruno Kiesler has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]