Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–22 Primera División RFEF, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021–22 Primera División RFEF".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–22 1ª RFEF, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021–22 1ª RFEF".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Thunderbolts (film), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

WP:TOOSOON. Season to be released in 2026 is too early to warrant a page on Wikipedia with no significant coverage. Better to keep it drafted and wait till release date gets closer as significant coverage in reliable sources can be expected by then.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Boys season 5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Season 2 isn't even released yet. This is all based on routine announcements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Squid Game season 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

No significant coverage in the sources and this is way too soon. Squid Game 2 has not even released yet and having Squid Game 3 that is only in talk with Netflix for future is WP:TOOSOON. When Squid Game 3 begins to have significant coverage after principal production or post production or even close to release date, more coverage will be there. For now, this is best kept as draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Squid Game season 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Season Four Finale. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A fine read especially with situation behind change in title however, this is just an episode that can be merge with The Boys season 4. It can also be updated under List of The Boys episodes

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Season Four Finale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marco camino 10,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Outer Banks season 1, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Outer Banks (TV series). Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Park Hee-soon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 🎄☃️ Paper9oll ☃️🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 11:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hwang In-ho (Squid Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Prince of Erebor were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The character creation section simply states that the character is portrayed by Lee Byung-hun, while the reception section includes only two reviews that briefly mention the character. More real-world context and additional sources are definitely needed to make this a standalone article. —

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hwang In-ho (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 07:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Born Again poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Season four finale poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at You season 5. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CocaPopsRather 23:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CocaPopsRather Incorrect. That was a valid edit. Kindly educate yourself on what vandalism actually is. -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restoring the edit and clarifying—I appreciate the correction! CocaPopsRather 15:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Squid game season 3 poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In-universe fluff sourced to essentially nothing. Episodes of the TV Show are primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Moser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Season four finale poster.jpeg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:52, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the article with the latest sources, you can find them here. As one who is unfortunately stuck with office work for the next several hours, I can't. Alex 21, you too may if possible. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Goldberg and Rhys Montrose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson Fisk (Marvel Cinematic Universe), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 23:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Season Four Finale. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please actually take the advice. Further resubmission is likely to lead to rejection to drive that point home

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Season Four Finale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend draftifying this until more sources can be found. As it stands, it fails to even meet the WP:THREE essay, and what is there for reception is somewhat weak, being only a criticism of performance and casting without any character analysis. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, tomorrow I will continue expanding the article since I was not able to this afternoon. Marco camino 10 (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just noticed you made a Recruiter page, and I've got similar concerns. I think it's important that you consider draftifying articles before you put them into mainspace, as it will give you time to ensure that they are up to snuff when it comes to notability. I especially think it's concerning that you're moving onto another article before the issues with the VIPs article have been addressed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, I'm really sorry, for the next one I had in mind, Hwang Jun-ho or the Game Guards, I'll do them in a draft first. I did them this way because for a previous one I did a draft and another one published the article with less precise information and so on. Marco camino 10 (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I may, could I ask that you wait on Jun-ho? Not to toot my own horn, but I'm very good at source searching, and would be able to supply you with a significant portion of good sources to show notability. I can do the same for the Recruiter, though I'm less sure about the VIPs' notability. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course man, I will also be editing the other articles. The previous days I couldn’t because of a problem in the Spanish Wikipedia Marco camino 10 (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tarlby was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Front Man (Squid Game) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hwang In-ho (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 02:50, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rick and Morty season 8.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Alex_21 _TALK 01:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Outer Banks season 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you hold off on Squid Game character articles until season 3 is completed? This would help provide a clearer picture on notability, and this way, we can have "complete" articles (i.e. articles that won't receive any significant updates). That's what I'm planning, and why I didn't do Kang No-eul or Kang Dae-ho, even though I think they could be notable, because it'd mean I only have to do one extensive search for each instead of multiple ones. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:31, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another idea, however, would be if you want to finish this draft: [1] the research is done, it just needs to be implemented. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll get on with Ali Abdul's. Marco camino 10 (talk) 10:21, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a good idea, since in the days when the season comes out, there would be a lot of information from interviews and other sources about the characters. This way, articles about Dae-ho, No-eul, and others could be created with all the information at our fingertips. Marco camino 10 (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ali Abdul Squid Game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Marco camino 10, it's Nelson. I tried my best to reduce it each and every time, feel free to inform me if you are not satisified with the latest version. I kinda relied on ChatGPT to make it as short as I can NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[2] I'd suggest working on finishing Recruiter and VIPs first, but this source is very good. Also this one for VIPs: [3] - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brian Moser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Arcrev1 (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. If you disagree with another user's edit, please initiate a discussion on the article’s talk page instead of reverting it unilaterally. Do not revert changes simply to match the style of another article. Wikipedia has established guidelines that must be followed. There are numerous reliable sources that use terms such as 'began', 'started', etc. However, according to Wikipedia guidelines, articles should not mimic the tone of news reports. Wikipedia requires a formal and encyclopedic tone, which contradicts your claim that formality is irrelevant. - Arcrev1 (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny you say I'm involved in an edit war when you were the one who started it. Maybe you started it. And it seems like a very vague excuse to say the rest of the articles are misspelled because they say "began." And if they're that bad, I could change them too, but I don't see you doing it. Either I'm getting at something more than something people don't even know about and that you're probably taking out of context, or your explanation isn't useful to me. Marco camino 10 (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Marco camino 10: I did not initiate the changes. You revised the word I originally used — 'commence' — and added internal links to 'principal photography', which appears to obscure the fact that you altered my edit. The fact that other articles you’ve edited use the word 'began' is not directly relevant here. If I come across similar instances, I have no issue replacing them where appropriate. Furthermore, when a word is repeated within the same section or paragraph, it is reasonable to apply lexical variety by using alternatives such as 'commence'. In the case of All of Us Are Dead, the word 'commence' was not originally present in the article. If the expectation is for me to correct every occurrence across numerous film and television articles, that disregards the collaborative nature of Wikipedia. Contributions and improvements should come from all editors, not just one. - Arcrev1 (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Brian Moser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Just saying that there is no confirmation that there are Squid games in other parts of the world. It's only shown in America and there's no verbal or visual footage of the games in other countries. As per wikipedia policy we only put what we see. HiGuys69420 (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was confirmed that the Games were played in more countries when in season 1 the VIPs said “this year, the Korea contest is the best”. They show the recruiter in America obviously because of the planned spin-off in there. But yes, the confirmation of Games all over the world was given on season 1 Marco camino 10 (talk) 00:40, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok can u put an efn on the s3 article explaining this? Thanks! HiGuys69420 (talk) 07:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Moser meeting Dexter Original Sin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fallout title card.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Death of Jonathan Moore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Dexter: Resurrection season 1, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Dexter:_Resurrection_season_1

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dexter: Resurrection season 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dexter: Resurrection season 1. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Death of Jonathan Moore".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dexter Resurrection season 1 poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alice in Borderland title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hwang In-ho (character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marco, sorry to disturb you. I understand your edit "In the first episode, it was established that we would refer to Leroy Hanlon as Hanlon. We will refer to his wife and son by their names." However, what if he is referred in the same sentence as his wife and son? Would it be fine to use first name there? HiGuys69420 (talk) 22:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HiGuys69420, in the first episode, Leroy Hanlon is mentioned first, and by the end, we're already calling him Hanlon. Regarding his wife and son, in the second episode, we use their full names when they're mentioned. So, if they were mentioned in the same sentence, Leroy would be referred to as Hanlon, as previously established, and his wife and son would be referred to by their given names. But since I don't want to be too "heavy" and strict, and it doesn't seem like a big deal to me, if you'd like, you can put Leroy after every mention of the character in the summary of both episodes. Marco camino 10 (talk) 23:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you Marco! =) HiGuys69420 (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hwang Jun-ho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dexter characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and M99. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hwang Jun-ho".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vestrian24Bio was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently its a WP:CFORK of the main article. Also, there isn't a need for separate season articles until at least details about two season are available.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:It: Welcome to Derry season 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vestrian24Bio 13:39, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Really do not understand your need to remove the stuff from the recap. The things I added were "removing defensor" because that's both an obsolete word and not really suitable for what was happening. I changed it to defending his image. Because that was relevant to the story. I added the location of the Great Khans, because that's a very well known location, and would be relevant to people reading the recap. I added what was happening in Vault 24, because again, relevant to people reading the recap. I added why Norm unfroze the people, because again relevant to the story and recap. I changed wording in places. But the recap was confusing in places, wrong in others. While yes the recap doesn't have to feature everything. A throwaway scene with Reg starting a new club was left in, while the entire reason why Norm was unfreezing everyone. A major plot point was removed. The recap wasn't that long. It had the details neccessary to get an understanding of the episode, without delving too deep.

I don't want to get into an edit war about this. I literally only changed it to begin with, because I watched the episode and said "This recap needs work." Basetornado (talk) 14:18, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You added lots of unnecessary information for the plot information, it's NOT important the experiment of Vault 24 or the options given to Norm. The summaries must be short, including only the necessary information, and yes, your summaries is way too long, the summaries must have 1100 letters maximum, and yours is longer. If you don't like it is your fault. No one had a problem with the summary because it's okay, don’t add irrelevant details. As said before, in the episode articleyou can add those details Marco camino 10 (talk) 14:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where does 1100 letters maximum come from? The MOS states 200 words. Mine has 181, yours has 182. The extra characters came from hyperlinks to other wiki pages.

Everything I added was either a core storyline, key location or because it was poorly written. Novac is a key location. Vault 24? That's a key storypoint, considering it's to do with the implanted chips and showing that it was a wider Vault Tec experiment. Norm being offered to take his fathers spot? Key storypoint. "tells someone over a microphone" is poorly written and sounds like English as a second language, which is why I changed it.

Again, not trying to be difficult, just rewrote it, because it was missing key storypoints and was poorly written to begin with. Happy to discuss those points and why they are not needed. Just saying they are unnecessary is unhelpful, because realistcally anything to do with Vault 32 and 33 was irrelevant.Basetornado (talk) 15:04, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got it from notes that were added to summaries when they were super long, to keep them from getting too long. Summaries are always measured in words, period. The experiment done in Vault 24 or the options given to Norm aren't necessary for the plot. The previous summary is perfectly fine, and the problem is the desire to add information that isn't essential to explaining what happens. What I did was expand on a previous summary that contained much less information. I honestly wouldn't mind erasing the bit about Vault 32, but I would add the bit about Vault 33, especially after watching the trailer of what's coming in the season. And the grammar shouldn't be complex or seem like it's for my intellectual level. If you think that, it's because you haven't seen how normally summaries are written on other articles. Everything is perfectly explained and the grammar is easy to understand; adding those other things to this summary, which should be short, is the unnecessary thing. Like I said, you can add those details to the episode article, where you can elaborate further. Marco camino 10 (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If summaries are measured in words, then it's not too long, and yours was slightly longer. So length is an irrelevant argument here.

Why are the experiments and the options given not neccessary? Just saying they aren't isn't helpful. The chips are a key storypoint, the experiment shows that its not just the man from the bar and the person in the vault. The options given is a key storypoint, to show that he was offered the chance to be like his dad, but refused.

"tells someone over a microphone" is the issue here with the grammar. It does not read naturally, and again reads as someone with English as a second language wrote it. Because yes, he spoke into a microphone, but thats not how you would write it. You would say "left a message to an unknown person/figure", because thats what they were doing and saying "someone" can lead to confusion, is that person in the room? Are they a background character who doesn't have a name? No, it was an unknown person. Nothing I wrote was difficult to read or complex grammar. Please let me know what was too complex if it was.

Again not looking to be difficult, just want actual reasons for removing them, rather than just "they were unneccessary" or "it's too long" when it's shorter than whats there currently. Basetornado (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, they are measured in letters, not words. If you want, put your summary and when I have a moment I try to mantain that information in less than 1100 letters Marco camino 10 (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:TVPLOT states 200 words, not letters. I will place back most of my summary. But we don't need to go by letters according to that. Basetornado (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your summary has lots of unnecessary information, if you put it, I would made it shorter. I literally told you that users used the letters method because with that measure it's easier to maje them as long as they have to be. No one had a problem with the information provided but you, adding information that is not necessary. I don't know what you don't understand about having to omit information that isn't absolutely necessary to tell the story. Other users have edited the initial summary and added only what was needed, so it's your problem. Marco camino 10 (talk) 15:51, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You edited it. Not others. Since I changed it originally, only you have edited it. Don't pretend that others have. I also just read what you changed it too, and you have made it more confusing. "which leads them to the abandoned Vault 24, where they discover a Vault-Tec experiment using chips for brainwashing; one implanted man briefly speaks to Lucy before his head explodes." It now reads as that the man was part of the original experiment, when it is likely the man that Hank kidnapped earlier.

Who uses letters? Again the MOS states words. If there's some evidence of using letters, i'm happy to read it. But everything I have seen says words. Just saying "users use the letters methods" is unhelpful, because that is just not the case, from what I have been able to actually find that is used throughout wiki.

Letters are useless because hyperlinks add to letters, but not words. For example hyperlinking the Ghoul and changing it to Cooper Howard vs just saying Cooper Howard is 39 characters vs 13.

I'm asking you to actually explain why those plotpoints are unnecessary. You just keep saying "they're unnecessary". Why? Explain why they're unnecessary, just saying they are is not helpful. Basetornado (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's the big deal about whether they discover an experiment or not? The only important thing about Vault 24 is the man who speaks to Lucy and his death. The option not to enter Hank's escape pod should have been added to the first season summary, which is when it was first presented, not just repeated now. Reg starting a club isn't important to the story. And for your information, I simply expanded on an initial summary; I didn't change anything else. And honestly, I don't think Vault 32 needs to be added. And stop with the nonsense about the MOS; I've already explained twice why I use the letters measure, so stop bringing it up. And I repeat, the initial summary was already perfectly fine; the only problem is you. And stop with the nonsense about adding perfect grammar, because, as I've said before, most summaries don't have it. Marco camino 10 (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're calling the MOS nonsense, then I don't know what to tell you. It's the manual of style. It's how summaries are meant to be written.

You didn't explain at all why you used letters, you just said people do. Who? The MOS is the standard, and it does not say letters, for the exact reason I said. Letters are misleading.

Perfect grammar? I'm not asking for perfect grammar. If you truly believe that what I was writing was too advanced etc, then you should not be editing on English wikipedia. I was writing about a line in it that was clearly written by someone with English as a second language. The type of line that is technically correct, but now how a native speaker would describe it.

The initial summary was lacking. That's why I changed it to begin with. I read it as a wikipedia user and thought it wasn't good enough. That's how wikipedia works. People see things that need improving and fix them. There was some things I added initially that could go, no issues with that. But a straight revert was unnecessary and your changes since based on your letters theory have made it worse.

Enjoy the page, do what you want to it. It's clear you're not acting in good faith about this.Basetornado (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The one not acting in good faith is you, insisting on adding information that you think the summary is already perfectly adequate. And I'm not calling the MOS nonsene, because to begin with, the current summary has 176 words, because I've shortened it, so don't come defending it now when yours exceeded that number of words, and the first one you added was even longer. The current summary is fine; there's nothing more to add. Not wanting to make long summaries when the relevant information is sufficient is what you call lacking good faith, if that's what works for your mindset, it's okay with me. If a summary is short because not much is needed, then it's fine; it doesn't have to be long. Marco camino 10 (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are not acting in good faith, because when I cited the MOS to you, you still said that you go by a different system and I should stop bringing it up. You're finally using the word count. But still misusing it. That's pretty clearly not acting in good faith.

When I asked why plot points were unnecessary, you just said they were and refused to elaborate. You finally did on one of them, because it was mentioned in Season 1. There's information in the summary you wrote from Season 1 already. The others you refused to elaborate on. Hence not acting in good faith.

When I said that a sentence sounded like it was written by someone withe english as a second language. You said to stop expecting perfect grammar. That wasn't perfect grammar, that was someone on English wikipedia wanting a sentence written how it would be written naturally in English. Not just being in English. Again bad faith.

You said that others liked the summary. No one edited it except for you after I made my changes. Again bad faith.

You also focused on making it shorter, rather than good. Then blamed me for trying to make it too long, when it was always a length that was perfectly acceptable.

What am I supposed to think, when you keep doing that?17:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC) Basetornado (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tired of explaining the same thing over and over. If a summary is too long, or even if it isn't but contains information that's completely unnecessary for telling the story, I'll fix it, that's all. Marco camino 10 (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thought that I would message here instead of communicating through edit summaries.

Apologies for any confusion regarding the changes to the cast list. Due to how my browser is set up the page was presented differently. Feel free to correct the formatting of the cast lists on the main article and second season articles as I previously changed those too.

Thanks for your help. Cheezknight (talk) 12:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there's nothing to apologize for, your edit was implemented to try and improve the article without any ill intent, and you also help keep the articles updated and accurate. I'll let you know in your discussion forum for future edits, but I included it as a summary of the edit to make it clear that it wasn't a change I made because I wanted myself without any real and understandable reason. Thank you for understanding and communicate everything :) Marco camino 10 (talk) 13:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Squid Game season 1, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squid Game season 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enclave (Fallout), a link pointing to the disambiguation page VGR was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Seem to have copied a big amount of this new article from my draft. Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft: Fallout (Enclave) by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Enclave (Fallout). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bristledidiot (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2026 (UTC) Bristledidiot (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marco camino 10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dexter: Resurrection season 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Euphoria (American TV series) instead.

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Euphoria (American TV series). Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Euphoria (American TV series).

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

This decline does not mean that season articles will not be accepted. It means that there should be discussion on the article talk page about whether season articles are appropriate. Please resubmit if there is discussion and there is a rough consensus for creating the season articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Euphoria season 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Euphoria (American TV series) instead.

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Euphoria (American TV series). Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Euphoria (American TV series).

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

This decline does not mean that season articles will not be accepted. It means that there should be discussion on the article talk page about whether season articles are appropriate. Please resubmit if there is discussion and there is a rough consensus for creating the season articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Euphoria season 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]