User talk:LarryTheBird2011

Welcome!

Hello, LarryTheBird2011! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sprunki has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 15 § Sprunki until a consensus is reached. ObserveOwl (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History of WarnerMedia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to History of WarnerMedia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to contribute to the History of WarnerMedia. I can't do it right now, but will towards the end of the day. We could collaborate on it as well if you want. TheFloridaTyper (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, LarryTheBird2011. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of WarnerMedia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LarryTheBird2011! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LarryTheBird2011,

Nominating an article for an AFD discussion is a complicated process that involves taking a lot of steps some of which you didn't complete. Please review the instructions for WP:AFD and make sure you tagged the article, notified the article creator, added the discussion to the AFD daily log page and so many other steps. Editors typically use Twinkle to handle creating AFD discussions. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of WarnerMedia (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheObsidianGriffon were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 07:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sprunki Phase 3

Hello, LarryTheBird2011

I edit here too, under the username Pppery and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Sprunki Phase 3, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 25 § Sprunki Phase 3.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dissolution of Turner Broadcasting System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissolution of Turner Broadcasting System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
asilvering (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For any CUs looking to check my work, the breadcrumb trail led through Nick Jr. Productions and was resolved via the logs on the IPv4 that sticks out when you CU this account. -- asilvering (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LarryTheBird2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not in anyway related to TYFDSI even if the breadcrumb trail leaded to nick jr productions LarryTheBird2011 (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:09, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LarryTheBird2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello,

I am writing to appeal my block. I understand that my account was blocked because it was believed to be potentially used by another user who was previously blocked. I want to clarify that this was not intentional, and I now understand why this raised concerns about possible sockpuppetry or account sharing.

I take responsibility for any activity that may have looked suspicious, and I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused. I want to be clear that I have not knowingly shared my account, nor will I ever allow anyone else to access it. I understand that each editor must use their own individual account and that using accounts to evade blocks is strictly prohibited.

Going forward, I will make sure that:

I am the only person who accesses this account.

I edit only from my own devices to avoid any mistaken identity issues.

I follow all Wikipedia policies, especially those regarding sockpuppetry and block evasion.

I want to contribute constructively and in good faith, and I hope to be given the opportunity to continue editing properly within the guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Please let me know if any further information is needed.LarryTheBird2011 (talk) 05:08, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"then maybe i should stay blocked"; you said it, not us. We want to hear from you, not an AI. An AI cannot tell us what is inside your mind or what you understand. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk page stalker) For anyone reviewing this unlock request, LarryTheBird has disclosed in this revision (and since removed it) that they used ChatGPT to make this mock-up response, so they clearly do not understand the matter or concerns at hand. Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 05:16, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

then maybe i should stay blocked

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LarryTheBird2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear wikipedians, i created this account to give myself a second chance at wikipedia after tysdsi which i acted very immature and showed i wasnt here to build a wiki. i created this account to not vanadalize wikipedia, but rather help it. it started with minor edits, to editing anything related to turner broadcasting or warner bros discovery. i didnt create this account to evade a ban but in reality at first i should have known about the unblock ticket system. so i am telling you guys the following: 1.I will commit to helping, not hindering the wiki. 2.I will not randomly put redirects and remove thigs without explination. and finally, 3.I will commit to be respectful around others and not be mean. Thank you admins, for taking the time to read this and i hope you take the time to rethink.LarryTheBird2011 (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You describe yourself as setting up this account to evade a block on your original account. Then you say it was not set up to evade that block. Both statements cannot be true simultaneously. Nor have you explained why you are contesting your block here instead of on your original account, via WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Its becuase i forgot the password to my orginal account and i rather do it here than have to do it on another device