Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (videogame) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kamenûk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Granny (videogame). Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The game isn't notable in its current state because the article does not evidence significant coverage in reliable sources. The usual way we establish this is by seeing if there have been reviews of the game from major mainstream critics. Check out WP:VG/S for what sort of sources we mean.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny (videogame) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 01:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Granny (videogame). Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kamenûk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gyattttt for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Gyattttt to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales ^Parley 20:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Next Gen Personal Finance, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pollia (talk) 21:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Next Gen Personal Finance. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it is eligible for speedy deletion in mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. asilvering (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kamenûk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ngpf for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.

If you don't want Ngpf to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cremastra (u — c) 21:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kamenûk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NGPF for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.

If you don't want NGPF to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cremastra (u — c) 21:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dclemens1971 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

If you resubmit, please include (1) WP:SECONDARY and (2) WP:RELIABLE sources that are (3) WP:INDEPENDENT of the organization and show (4) significant coverage, or WP:SIGCOV, of the subject. Please replace promotional/marketing content with encyclopedic content. And you must show why this organization is notable. It is not enough merely to state its product offerings; that is a marketing document. The organization's claim to notability must be evident to the reader. A resubmission without changes to address this comment is likely to be rejected as unsuitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Next Gen Personal Finance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suspension (punishment), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rule. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kamenûk. Thank you for your work on Strut vowel. Another editor, Utopes, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

No mention of "strut vowel" at the target.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Utopes}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dark They Were, and Golden-Eyed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abandonment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Heavy Grasshopper were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Comments by previous reviewer still apply, the sources cited need to be independent and not just links to the websites of partnership organisations. Please read the links given by the previous reviewer and address their concerns. If I may quote from the previous reviewer, you need to use (1) WP:SECONDARY and (2) WP:RELIABLE sources that are (3) WP:INDEPENDENT of the organization and show (4) significant coverage, or WP:SIGCOV, of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Next Gen Personal Finance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on I.P.A. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because

• it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or

• it is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. QEnigma talk 04:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Granny, from its old location at User:Kamenûk/Granny. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 00:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bluethricecreamman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 02:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Granny. Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 03:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gyatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyattdamn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that on User:Kamenûk/Interlang you used mainly the Thorn symbol for the "th" sound, but didn't use it in the word "orthography". I don't know why I feel the need to tell you that, but for some reason it kind of bugs me lol. Gaismagorm (talk) 00:12, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I use þorn for English. Þe orþography for the interlang is its own þing separate from þe orþography for English. As for the interlang, it is still very much under development and I don’t/didn’t expect someone to actually look at it. Kamenûk (talk – contrib.) 11:21, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted many of your edits because u were adding links where links arent needed. For example, you dont need to link island, 1953, swedish, and new york state. Check out MOS:OL & MOS:COMMONWORDS. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also keep in mind MOS:SEAOFBLUE & MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks again! Masterhatch (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep these in mind. Thank you for the heads-up! Kamenûk (talk – contrib.) 18:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you are "keeping this in mind", you are still overlinking. Please stop until you learn how to properly link. Thank you for your understanding. (@Masterhatch:). Magnolia677 (talk) 23:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just reveted your edit at Siege because you're linking years again. Please stop overlinking. Please. Masterhatch (talk) 00:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are still over linking. Please stop. I've reverted several of your edits. Masterhatch (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change ' and " into this ’ and ”. I have no idea why you did that at Yharnam. Also, i reverted your edit at Goofy ahh because redirects don't get short descriptions. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you did it at Gay too. Why? Masterhatch (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you genuinely want to know? If so, I think the curly quotation marks and curly apostrophes look better than their straight counterparts. Kamenûk (talk – contrib.) 00:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have a read at MOS:CURLY. And then please stop changing them. Masterhatch (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing it again at McFatter Technical College and Technical High School. Please rereview MOS:CURLY. Masterhatch (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this is such an issue. Please, please stop. I reverted Miss Havisham. Masterhatch (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at SCP Foundation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving "the" into the wiki link as you did at Skriðuklaustur and many other articles. Masterhatch (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are still over linking. And going back to 'the', you don't need to create wiki links such as The Columbia River, The Snake River, The Willamette Valley, The Lemhi Pass. Those, and the others, should be all deleted. You've been around long enough, please stop making more work for other editors. Masterhatch (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kamenûk. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 20:02, 27 September 2025 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 20:02, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia Respelling has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § Wikipedia Respelling until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:01, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia respelling has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § Wikipedia respelling until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:01, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Novigrad, The Free City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § Novigrad, The Free City until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Novigrad (The Free City) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § Novigrad (The Free City) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Novigrad, the Free City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § Novigrad, the Free City until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Novigrad (the Free City) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § Novigrad (the Free City) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kamenûk... Signed your guestbook and added it on a list on your behalf. Nice time! Volten001 ^☎ 17:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Kamenûk (talk – contrib.) 00:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome Volten001 ^☎ 05:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to ask you in the future to exercise some caution when translating from languages that you're not fully familiar with; your translation of the main title of the hymn "Ut queant laxis" was completely incorrect. Obviously it's not a big deal, and clearly you're a very prolific and helpful editor overall, but translation is an area to be cautious in without a degree of study or training in the source language.

Thanks! RocksInMyDryer (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Volten001 ^☎ 03:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was wondering whether you'd be okay with me further abstracting some information from your Blooket draft, I feel the article needs to be downsized considering the many rejections and comments of it not meeting to a variety of guidelines. Once guidelines are met, i'd love to then work on expanding the article further with your assistance. Thank you! Lhcfu (talk) 17:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit any article or draft however you feel necessary, as long as your edits follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Wikipedia is made with collaboration, and as such anyone can edit anything if that edit is beneficial. 😊 Kamenûk (talk – contrib.) 18:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot, hopefully the article can get out of draft soon! Lhcfu (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Granny (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect LankyBox has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 22 § LankyBox until a consensus is reached. ConeKota (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camille Vasquez, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]