User talk:Guylaen
Infobox military exercise
Regading {{Infobox military exercise}}, it sounds like you want to overhaul the template to add new information and make it more useful... Can I help in anyway? I'm pretty good with infoboxes, one of my few talents... Anyway, if you want to team up I'm happy to help! - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:27, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am wondering if we should make a more general exercise infobox though.
- For example, Clade X was an exercise about pandemics.
- There are other exercises that other government departments and even businesses do. Guylaen (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- How would you like to do this? Do you want to provide me with a list of values/parameters and I'll build the code? What would work best for you? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08, sorry for the extreme lack of communication about this on my part. We just did Cyber 9/12 here at MIIS – I wasn't on a team, but I had to be available if they needed me to fold down tables. Last week I had a French conversational midterm, and then I had to go up to LLNL to visit the NIF, so a bunch of my time was spent on that. Today, I had to meet with Vladimir Norov and catch up on Central Asian issues. (I was surprised at his positive attitude about Trump and now my brain hurts). Next week I have to run the CCPCJ for Northwest Model United Nations (NWMUN).
- Basically, all that to say that life is busy, but I suppose I did that to myself. I'm the one who wanted to stop working in kitchens, after all.
- Anyways. YES. That would work. Guylaen (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- HAHA! No worries. Real life does get in the way sometime. The nice thing is there is no deadline here... Whenever you get the time, start mocking something up and I'm happy to work with you when it works in your schedule. No rush! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not ready yet. Just commenting so this convo doesn't get auto archived. Guylaen (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08
- Some information I've discovered about this subject... there is, to many scholars, a difference between:
- Exercise
- Wargame / Crisis game
- Model
- Simulation
- Moderated Discussion / BOGGSAT
- Guylaen (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I just had a conversation with Jacquelyn Schneider about what characteristics should go into this infobox, and she said "We've been trying to figure that out for years to make searching the website easier."
- So... yeah. I still need some time working out the basics of this infobox. But I might work with Schneider and the team at the Hoover Institute on some of the basics.
- (More on Schneider: https://www.hoover.org/profiles/jacquelyn-schneider) Guylaen (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not ready yet. Just commenting so this convo doesn't get auto archived. Guylaen (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- HAHA! No worries. Real life does get in the way sometime. The nice thing is there is no deadline here... Whenever you get the time, start mocking something up and I'm happy to work with you when it works in your schedule. No rush! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- How would you like to do this? Do you want to provide me with a list of values/parameters and I'll build the code? What would work best for you? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited René Joyeuse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Operation SUSSEX
In the category of great minds think alike, three or four days ago I noticed there was no article about Operation Sussex. I was gathering material to create an article -- when suddenly I discover you had just created an article. It's kind of weird that two of us had the same idea at the same time for such an obscure topic. Anyway, good work -- and I'm actually glad you've relieved me of feeling an obligation to create the article. Smallchief (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Chief! That fills me with joy for you to say that, I love your work here. Yeah, I was brought to the page after writing OSS/London.
- But I would love it if you could expand the page, you've made a lot of great articles, and I would enjoy seeing what you can dig up about SUSSEX, maybe from some places that I haven't thought of. Do you think that Operation PROUST should have its own page or should just be redirected to SUSSEX?
- I'm working on Kenneth Cohen at the moment, and I will probably write Z Organisation next – obviously a Yank created the redirect for Z Organization, because that's not how Brits write that word. (I'm a Yank, I just refuse to use the word "American" because it's literally not a demonym for someone from this State of states). After that, canceling the redirect for Operation Greenup, and making it its own page. After that, will probably write Operation FAUST and the TOOL missions and... so on.
- If you want to take any of these articles, let me know.
- Also, please check out Template:Office of Strategic Services and let me know if anything is missing. Guylaen (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Your Sussex article is great and much more in-depth than my usual effort. I have no plans to work on any OSS-related articles, so have at it! I'll let you know if I might be crossing paths with something you're in the midst of doing. Smallchief (talk) 07:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Loaded sock
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Loaded sock, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Rectified. Guylaen (talk) 03:02, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Backstory
Since you've been doing so much work on the Claude Dansey article, I thought you might be amused to know that I only started the article in the first place because of an offhand mention of Dansey in one of Charles Stross's Laundry stories.
"By the abjuration of Dee and the name of Claude Dansey I hereby exercise subsection D paragraph sixteen clause twelve and bind you to service from now and forevermore." DS (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's crazy he did so much, and yet his obituary in the New York Times was only like eight sentences long!!!! He took his secrets to the grave. Thank the gods other people didn't.
- The only problem with most of his biographical material being written after he died is that he didn't have the chance to defend against the accusations about the Prosper Network and Delacort. Guylaen (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- And there are mixed reviews about Colonel Z, but the only ones I care about are the ones by the people who worked at the agency, and they say its mostly accurate with only minor errors like names and dates – as is to be found in basically every history of the SIS. Did you know they didn't even publicly acknowledge their existence until 1992‽‽‽‽‽
- Anyways, yeah, I just needed a break from his world for a bit. I got very interested in North Borneo after writing that section so I'm making the page for the constabulary now. Guylaen (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
A gift for you!
| The empire on which the sun never sets recognition | |
| For your massive work on the North Borneo Police Force 👮🏻 I hereby send you this recognition. Thank you. Ṉight Ḻantern 🏮 01:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Frederick Vanden Heuvel

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Frederick Vanden Heuvel, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Closed Limelike Curves
- I see that you have removed the nomination for deletion. Thank you. I know, the names and titles are pretty crazy – when I read that he was a "Count of the HRE" in the source material, I also did a double-take. Those funny little monarchs and their titles of nobility, am I right? Guylaen (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Apparently like his grandfather or great-great grandfather was a count in the HRE and he retained the title or something, I didn't really care about that part besides getting it accurate. Guylaen (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yep, sorry about that, that was my bad! Crazy titles and the rest of it seemed pretty wild too. On the first source I pulled up I made a typo while searching, which made it look like the guy's name didn't even show up in the source, so I thought it was just made up. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... I wish I had more time to track down more stuff about him, but my imput is going to slow down in about a week when Spring Term starts back up.
- I really wrote the article because I wanted to write Z Organisation and his name came up, but I got side-tracked expanding Claude Dansey and that led my to start working on North Borneo Police Force. I feel like I have to finish these things now before I come back to the Count. Guylaen (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... I wish I had more time to track down more stuff about him, but my imput is going to slow down in about a week when Spring Term starts back up.
- Yep, sorry about that, that was my bad! Crazy titles and the rest of it seemed pretty wild too. On the first source I pulled up I made a typo while searching, which made it look like the guy's name didn't even show up in the source, so I thought it was just made up. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Apparently like his grandfather or great-great grandfather was a count in the HRE and he retained the title or something, I didn't really care about that part besides getting it accurate. Guylaen (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intelligence field, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligence community was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- Correct. Until that disamb page is turned into an article, unfortunately, that's all I can do for now. Guylaen (talk) 09:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Intelligence field
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Intelligence field, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:41, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Freedom Hall (Kyiv)
Hello, Guylaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Freedom Hall (Kyiv), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Tambunan Expedition Medal. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for this article. Is there much scope for expanding it?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ingratis (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Short answer: yes.
- Long answer: I don't have the time right now, I'm expanding other pages. Guylaen (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was not pushing you - I was just wondering whether it would be possible or desirable to combine the various stubs/short articles on the medals from this campaign into one longer one, but since there is scope for expansion that's clearly not a useful idea. Ingratis (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Nah, the problem is that there just aren't enough articles about the North Borneo expeditions yet. Guylaen (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- North Borneo as a subject, generally, needs expansion into many more articles. Guylaen (talk) 04:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Nah, the problem is that there just aren't enough articles about the North Borneo expeditions yet. Guylaen (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was not pushing you - I was just wondering whether it would be possible or desirable to combine the various stubs/short articles on the medals from this campaign into one longer one, but since there is scope for expansion that's clearly not a useful idea. Ingratis (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Rebuilding of Cyrene
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rebuilding of Cyrene, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- You have automatically detected correctly but you're not as good as the other bot who automatically fixed it. Guylaen (talk) 04:42, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Rebuilding of Cyrene. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. This is a well-known historical event that I have worked on extensively. Unfortunately, I am not convinced that it can be its own stand alone article, and certainly not in its current state. Please see if you can expand it. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)