Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 06:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colorado Lagoon has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Surfinsi -- Surfinsi (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarfroe, if you're still interested in pursuing this nomination, please let me know. I can arrange for the nomination to be reinstated with its original seniority and placed into the pool of nominations needing a reviewer. There's no reason this should have been failed because the reviewer abandoned their review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Alright, thank you. If you could please wait a day before doing so, that would be greatly appreciated because there may be more info that I'd like to add which I might do tonight. - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 00:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

please stop removing my photo it is my original photo i am a photographer RiotVisuals from london and i shot this photo at his london show on the 28th the email literally linked to my wiki account is the linked to all riotvisual socials so that is the proof it is me Ryann50 (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryann50: Hello, if are the actual photographer of the image, would it be possible for you to upload the photograph with the metadata attached to it rather than a download from the website? This would allow us to actually verify that it is you and, in addition, allow us to use a higher quality photo. - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 20:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ive edited the photo on photoshop adding some effects on it its not a download its the edited version from photoshop hence why the metadata has been lost because it docent save from photoshop Ryann50 (talk) 16:18, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

i will upload the version with the metadata included Ryann50 (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colorado Lagoon has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrueMoriarty -- TrueMoriarty (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Colorado Lagoon has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JustARandomSquid -- JustARandomSquid (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TheBurntPeanut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheBurntPeanut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Megabyte21 (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]