User talk:Abhilash2006

Speedy deletion nomination of Sini Abraham

Hello Abhilash2006,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sini Abraham for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JackTracker (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aangelina Abraham

Hello Abhilash2006,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aangelina Abraham for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JackTracker (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Template:User Malayalam Wikipedia

You can add this template in your user page.Template:User Malayalam Wikipedia.--Path slopu (talk) 10:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Pilaz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Model United Nations have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhilash2006. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Creative Hut Institute of Photography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shaju Sreedhar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lizy K Fernandez moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lizy K Fernandez. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lizy K Fernandez (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 09:51, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lizy K Fernandez (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afstromen was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Afstromen (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Abhilash2006! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Afstromen (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aghosham moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aghosham. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Lack of critical receptions in at least two WP:RS as per WP:NFILM. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 23:52, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aghosham (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaCore was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not WP:FILM yet.

Lacks at least two critical reception/reviews in reliable sources, if the film released. Refer: WP:ICTFSOURCES to verify the reliability of common Indian sources.

I suggest refraining from unnecessary details.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaCore talk 13:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your move on Aghosham from draft space

Hey @Abhilash2006

I see that you moved the draft of the film to mainspace. I just want to let you know why the article moved to draft and got declined AFC as the concern hasn’t been addressed yet.

So, for a released feature film, it needs at least two critical reviews from ‘reliable sources’ and you still haven’t added them yet. If you add them it will be good. Even I mentioned the same thing your AFC decline comment.

Pleasse let me know you have any doubt. Thank you. AlphaCore talk 13:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AlphaCore,
Thank you for your note. I’d like to clarify that I have already added the critical reviews to the article. However, the film is still running in theaters, so more comprehensive reviews are still coming in.
I’ll continue monitoring and update the article with additional reliable reviews as they become available. Please let me know if this works or if you need any further clarification.
Thanks for your guidance!
Best regards,
Abhilash Abhilash2006 08:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Abhilash2006 Hey,
Are we still on Aghosham ?
I see no reviews apart from coverages about first look poster. Once you found them (at least two) add them under Reception section. Do not move it to mainspace without addressing the issue as it will go for deletion. AlphaCore talk 13:53, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.madhyamam.com/n-1479284
https://www.mathrubhumi.com/movies-music/news/aghosham-malayalam-christmas-release-jny1yqib ~2026-17369-1 (talk) 04:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lizy K Fernandez

Information icon Hello, Abhilash2006. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lizy K Fernandez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]