Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hakkari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reason for why you are removing Silla as well as the subsequent aftermath to the Baekje-Tang War from List of Wars of Independence. It is clearly well documented that Baekje was supported by Yamato Japan and was defeated by the Tang-Silla Alliance Sunnyediting99 (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) It was more complicated than that, given that Taizong of Tang had originally promised that lands below the Taedong river to Silla during the conflict, and that Silla used that as a casus bellus to destroy the occupation within a few years.

2) This is a fair argument, though again given that it was overthrown a few years after its establishment, it might necessate that additional point.

Also why did you delete your response? I had initially asked the question out of good faith. Sunnyediting99 (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mongolian Revolution of 1911, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khovd.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that the Battle of Lalakaon be considered a liberation war, since it involved the Orthodox Byzantine Empire annexing the Muslim Emirate of Melitene and later the Paulician Principality of Tephrike. Epitome of Creativity (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is inappropriate, as the two states joined this war not for opposing Byzantine rule or sovereignty over them. Besides, the Emirate leader had come to power 30 years before the war and was a vassal of the Abbasid Empire. This suggests that the Byzantine emperor annexed the Emirate in response to their depredations, not because he felt the Emirate was challenging his sovereignty over territories he later annexed. Many thanks for discussion with me. 特磨 (talk) 04:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monarchy of Cambodia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramesuan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your change in the piped link for "Company of the Indies". The French Indies Company, which you redirected the link to, was founded in 1723, after the Natchez Revolt. The Company of the Indies mentioned in the article is John Law's Company, formally Compagnie des Indes at the time it was dissolved but popularly known as the Mississippi Company.17:53, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. However, the article of Natchez Revolt states that the rebellion took place in 1729, which is later than 1723. But there may be something I am not clear about. 特磨 (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct; I'll revert myself. I think I flipped 1723 to 1732 in my head. The whole transition of company control in Louisiana at the time was pretty convoluted, so I'll add that to a reason for my mistake.—Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm also studying world history by reading and editing Wikipedia. 特磨 (talk) 18:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Mirwais Hotak did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@特磨:: Hello, could you please create the page Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq with just a redirect to Great Seljuk Empire, basically please write this code - #REDIRECT Great Seljuk Empire

.

I just want to cite Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq in one of my edits, but temporary accounts can not create a page, and I just don't want to create an ordinary account and wait to do such a small thing. If you create Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq with a redirect, my small edit would look much nicer instead of jsut being red. Basically, the redirect would be justified too since Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq was basically part of or at some points even equivalent of Great Seljuk Empire. Please help with this edit, your help would be very appriciated. ~2025-36098-21 (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you can edit like this: Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq. 特磨 (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poznań Uprising.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isa Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musa Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]