This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Conservatism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Skepticism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Presidents Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Presidents of the United States (assessed as Low-importance). Presidents of the United States: Donald Trump Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesPresidents of the United States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force.

To show a deranged loyalty to Donald Trump. Accepting his every word, as gospel Ignoring reality to follow the great orange one ~2025-41276-13 (talk) 00:40, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you have reliable sources for somebody using it with that meaning. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:48, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You have no articles proving the opposite. If you want to prove Trump Derangement Syndrome deserves it's own entry, then create entries for Bush and Obama. There are NO reliable sources proving Trump Derangement Syndrome existed before the others. ~2026-15250-3 (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I do not "want to prove Trump Derangement Syndrome". I am saying that Wikipedia follows reliable sources. Reliable sources say that Donald Trump (who BTW is a extremely corrupt, stupid, childish, senile and vile clown who belongs in Arkham Asylum for the Criminally Insane, but I cannot give a reliable source for that although it is true) and his bootlickers use the term in a certain way. As far as I know, reliable sources do not say that there is alternative meaning. But if you know that they do, please tell us. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

LOL ~2026-54914-4 (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the other articles of Obama Derangement Syndrome or Bush Derangement Syndrome (the original source)? This is an incredibly biased article in that the sources are ALL Trump supporters. ~2025-41160-58 (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about the examples given, why would someone who isn't a Trump supporter use the term in the first place? And if you can provide reliable sources supporting the notability of the other two terms you mentioned, I'm sure many editors, myself included, would be happy to create articles for them. — An anonymous username, not my real name 07:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to point out that this alternative meaning, as well as sources for such use, has already been included in the article since 2022, notably at the end of the lead. Sccgeography (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I should have checked. And the IP should have. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:32, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is very biased. TDS is a condition not a tactic used by anyone. Clealry te editor of this post has TDS. ~2026-86526-0 (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: because:

1. You have no proof of this or actual rationale other than your own reckoning (as it seems)
2. More than one person has edited this page. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Remove pseudoscifiic label, no one means it that way aside form a few nutjobs, its a political term, clearly left leanig bias. Ccdownfallbraveheart (talk) 02:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out where it says pseudoscientific? I did Ctrl + F and couldn't find any instances of it. EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 22:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about the congressmen who introduced bills to classify TDS as a form of mental illness, that's in the article because its both relevant and has been covered by reliable sources. EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 22:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh is gone now Ccdownfallbraveheart (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]