Talk:New York State Route 7
 | New York State Route 7 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interstate 92
Should be mentioned mentioned in the history section of this article that this highway has been been proposed as I-92 for a while? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 20:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
GA concerns
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- The "Route description" is not sourced. Is this information correct, and can it be sourced?
- The lead does not provide an overview of all aspects of the article, and is missing the history of the route, realignments, and suffixed routes.
Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
The "Route description" is not sourced. Is this information correct, and can it be sourced? The lead does not provide an overview of all aspects of the article, and is missing the history of the route, realignments, and suffixed routes. Z1720 (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- That was something I noticed as well, but I didn't bother opening a GAR. Wow, the route description really isn't sourced. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps we can use a mapping software as a source such as Google Maps? I know it should be used with caution, but it would be a good source if we can't find any others. ToThAc (talk) 00:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well, the best-case scenario would probably be to use the USGS maps as well, since they are official maps which were licensed from USGS and can be trusted easily. This is just a suggestion, so I'm not sure. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps we can use a mapping software as a source such as Google Maps? I know it should be used with caution, but it would be a good source if we can't find any others. ToThAc (talk) 00:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)