Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 21:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I will do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with images. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find any major issues with Earwig. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with stability, focusing, or neutrality. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing about his birth date or anything about his death. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have moved the dates to lede only - corrected now. Tomobe03 (talk) 16:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No major WP:MOS or grammar issues I can find. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will spotcheck sources 1, 5, 9, and 10. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will replace one and five with four and 11, because I don't have access to 1 and 5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They all seem good. I will pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed